Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1509.06778

On the impact of Masking and Blocking Hypotheses for measuring efficacy of new tuberculosis vaccines

Abstract

Over the past 60 years, the Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has been used worldwide to prevent tuberculosis (TB). However, BCG has shown a very variable efficacy in different trials, showing a wide range of protection in adults against pulmonary TB. Previous studies indicate that this failure is related to pre-existing immune response to antigens that are common to environmental sources of mycobacterial antigens and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Specifically, two different mechanisms have been hypothesized: the masking, (previous sensitization confers some level of protection against TB), and the blocking (previous immune response prevent vaccine taking of a new TB vaccine), effects. In this work we introduce a series of models to discriminate between masking and blocking mechanisms and address their relative likelihood. The application of our models to interpret the results coming from the BCG-REVAC clinical trials, specifically designed for the study of sources of efficacy variability yields estimates that are consistent with high levels of blocking (41% in Manaus -95% C.I. [14%-68%]- and 96% in Salvador -95% C.I. [52%-100%]-), and no support for masking to play any relevant role in modifying vaccine efficacy either alone or aside blocking. The quantification of these effects around a plausible model constitutes a relevant step towards impact evaluation of novel anti-tuberculosis vaccines, which are susceptible of being affected by similar effects if applied on individuals previously exposed to mycobacterial antigens.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sergio Arregui, Joaquín Sanz, Dessislava Marinova, Carlos Martín, Yamir Moreno. 2015-09-22. On the impact of Masking and Blocking Hypotheses for measuring efficacy of new tuberculosis vaccines. https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06778

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

From daylight to darkness: a nonlocal model of circadian activity cycles

An animal's ability to perceive its surroundings, as well as the ecological interactions it experiences, can be strongly influenced by the sleep patterns of both itself and surrounding species. Animals with limited sensory capabilities may struggle to navigate their habitat at night, while in a predator-prey system, it may be detrimental for prey to be inactive while predators are awake and hunting. Here, we develop a general mathematical framework to study these interactions using partial differential equations, incorporating activity cycles and daylight-dependent perception into existing models of animal movement. We show that both the dominant sensory mode and the length of daylight are key factors determining the strength of aggregation in social species. Extending this framework to a two-species predator-prey system, we use game-theoretic approaches to show that the equilibrium sleep strategy of each species is shaped not only by its own sensory capabilities, but also by those of its ecological opponent. Depending on the sensory capabilities of the two species, equilibrium strategies may consist of a single sleep pattern or a combination of multiple sleep patterns.

q-bio.PE

Evolution as fitness landscape navigation: concepts, measures, and emerging questions

Fitness landscapes are mappings between genotypes, phenotypes, and fitness that shape evolution. In recent years, empirical work and theoretical models have greatly advanced our understanding of how populations navigate rugged fitness landscapes. Here, we provide a timely review of the theoretical aspects of this field. Its rapidly growing literature employs a wide range of terms, which are sometimes used ambiguously or inconsistently. We therefore begin by defining the major concepts and the field's vocabulary, highlighting our own terminology choices wherever needed. We then review key results on the relationships between epistasis, ruggedness, accessibility, and navigability for genotype-fitness maps, highlighting several complex and sometimes counterintuitive connections that have emerged. Further, we review how the conserved structural properties of the underlying genotype-phenotype map, which can lead to the formation of large connected neutral networks of genotypes, influence dynamics on fitness landscapes. We then compare the two levels to study landscape navigation: the level of genotype-phenotype maps and the level of genotype-fitness maps. Our review leads us to propose a new measure of navigability, based on evolutionary outcomes, that is broadly applicable and overcomes limitations of existing measures. Finally, we highlight examples from the smaller body of work that relaxes the common assumption of fitness-monotonic paths on static landscapes, and discuss how this can fundamentally change the nature of fitness landscape navigation. Throughout the review, we identify directions for future work to fill existing gaps and to synthesize the disparate strands of research within the field.

q-bio.PE

Best Matches in Phylogenetic Networks

Best match graphs (BMGs) were introduced in mathematical phylogenetics to describe the concept of closest relatives for related genes (leaves of rooted tree) in different organisms (defining leaf colors). We generalize this concept here to leaf-colored rooted networks, where least common ancestors are in general neither unique nor comparable. We characterize BMGs of rooted networks as those vertex-colored digraphs that are properly colored and satisfy an easy-to-check condition that we call the sicor-in-hub property. BMGs can be recognized in linear time and an explaining network can be constructed in quadratic time. Analogous results are obtained for reciprocal best match graphs (RBMGs), where an edge $\{x,y\}$ corresponds to pairs of vertices with different color that are mutually closest relatives.

q-bio.PE