Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1509.08068

Block-Level Parallelism in Parsing Block Structured Languages

Abstract

Softwares source code is becoming large and complex. Compilation of large base code is a time consuming process. Parallel compilation of code will help in reducing the time complexity. Parsing is one of the phases in compiler in which significant amount of time of compilation is spent. Techniques have already been developed to extract the parallelism available in parser. Current LR(k) parallel parsing techniques either face difficulty in creating Abstract Syntax Tree or requires modification in the grammar or are specific to less expressive grammars. Most of the programming languages like C, ALGOL are block-structured, and in most languages grammars the grammar of different blocks is independent, allowing different blocks to be parsed in parallel. We are proposing a block level parallel parser derived from Incremental Jump Shift Reduce Parser by [13]. Block Parallelized Parser (BPP) can even work as a block parallel incremental parser. We define a set of Incremental Categories and create the partitions of a grammar based on a rule. When parser reaches the start of the block symbol it will check whether the current block is related to any incremental category. If block parallel parser find the incremental category for it, parser will parse the block in parallel. Block parallel parser is developed for LR(1) grammar. Without making major changes in Shift Reduce (SR) LR(1) parsing algorithm, block parallel parser can create an Abstract Syntax tree easily. We believe this parser can be easily extended to LR (k) grammars and also be converted to an LALR (1) parser. We implemented BPP and SR LR(1) parsing algorithm for C Programming Language. We evaluated performance of both techniques by parsing 10 random files from Linux Kernel source. BPP showed 28% and 52% improvement in the case of including header files and excluding header files respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abhinav Jangda. 2015-09-27. Block-Level Parallelism in Parsing Block Structured Languages. https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.08068

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Expressive power of one-shot control operators and coroutines

Control operators, such as exceptions and effect handlers, provide a means of representing computational effects in programs abstractly and modularly. While most theoretical studies have focused on multi-shot control operators, one-shot control operators---which restrict the use of captured continuations to at most once---are gaining attention for their balance between expressiveness and efficiency. This study aims to fill the gap. We present a mathematically rigorous comparison of the expressive power among one-shot control operators, including effect handlers, delimited continuations, and even asymmetric coroutines. Following previous studies on multi-shot control operators, we adopt Felleisen's macro-expressiveness as our measure of expressiveness. We verify the folklore that one-shot effect handlers and one-shot delimited-control operators can be macro-expressed by asymmetric coroutines, but not vice versa. We explain why a previous informal argument fails, and how to revise it to make a valid macro-translation.

cs.PL

Authorization Revocation for Long-Running AI Agents: Root-Scoped Quiescence under Delegation and Asynchronous Execution

Long-running AI agents outlive initiating processes through credentials, delegated tasks, queues, callbacks, reservations, and provider-side operations. Cancellation, process exit, and credential revocation neither close every pre-cut carrier nor distinguish independently authorized shared work. We define root-scoped authorization quiescence: for each manifested sink, a certificate accounts for every cut-relevant acceptance under the retired root-epoch atom that precedes its local fence and excludes protected acceptance under that atom after the fence, while permitting exact rebind to a current, independently sufficient support. The root-scoped quiescence protocol linearizes a root cut, fences old-root expansion and protected sinks, represents alternative and conjunctive authority as antichains of minimal sufficient root sets, and composes provider-frontier certificates into a cutset over registered old-root paths. Exact channel-token accounting reconciles transfers; missing or conflicting evidence remains indeterminate. Under stated assumptions, we prove post-cut issuer non-expansion, support-sound projection, compositional soundness under exact channel conservation, independent-support preservation, merge-order independence, and crash/replay stability. A provider-free late-effect test suite matches 17/17 registered outcomes. Two cancellation-only and one cut-only execution accept the same class of already scheduled late effect; two cut-plus-fence executions, one restart, and one stale-process execution reject it. A separately implemented checker verifies 17/17 traces and rejects 44/44 consistently rehashed semantic regressions. The certificate establishes root-relative authorization quiescence within its bound manifest and configuration, not global idleness, rollback, or business completion.

cs.PL

Soda: An Object-Oriented Functional Language for Specifying Human-Centered Problems

We present Soda (Symbolic Objective Descriptive Analysis), a language that helps to treat qualities and quantities in a natural way and greatly simplifies the task of checking correctness. We present key properties for the language motivated by the design of a descriptive language to encode complex requirements on computer systems, and we explain how these key properties must be addressed to model these requirements with simple definitions. We give an overview of a tool that helps to describe problems in an easy way, which we consider more transparent and less error-prone.

cs.PL