Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1510.00078

Topological Ramsey numbers and countable ordinals

Abstract

We study the topological version of the partition calculus in the setting of countable ordinals. Let $α$ and $β$ be ordinals and let $k$ be a positive integer. We write $β\to_{top}(α,k)^2$ to mean that, for every red-blue coloring of the collection of 2-sized subsets of $β$, there is either a red-homogeneous set homeomorphic to $α$ or a blue-homogeneous set of size $k$. The least such $β$ is the topological Ramsey number $R^{top}(α,k)$. We prove a topological version of the Erdős-Milner theorem, namely that $R^{top}(α,k)$ is countable whenever $α$ is countable. More precisely, we prove that $R^{top}(ω^{ω^β},k+1)\leqω^{ω^{β\cdot k}}$ for all countable ordinals $β$ and finite $k$. Our proof is modeled on a new easy proof of a weak version of the Erdős-Milner theorem that may be of independent interest. We also provide more careful upper bounds for certain small values of $α$, proving among other results that $R^{top}(ω+1,k+1)=ω^k+1$, $R^{top}(α,k)< ω^ω$ whenever $α<ω^2$, $R^{top}(ω^2,k)\leqω^ω$ and $R^{top}(ω^2+1,k+2)\leqω^{ω\cdot k}+1$ for all finite $k$. Our computations use a variety of techniques, including a topological pigeonhole principle for ordinals, considerations of a tree ordering based on the Cantor normal form of ordinals, and some ultrafilter arguments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrés Eduardo Caicedo, Jacob Hilton. 2017-04-09. Topological Ramsey numbers and countable ordinals. https://doi.org/10.1090/conm%2F690%2F13864

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO