Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1510.00229

Making problems tractable on big data via preprocessing with polylog-size output

Jiannan Yang·Hanpin Wang·Yongzhi Cao
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To provide a dichotomy between those queries that can be made feasible on big data after appropriate preprocessing and those for which preprocessing does not help, Fan et al. developed the $\sqcap$-tractability theory. This theory provides a formal foundation for understanding the tractability of query classes in the context of big data. Along this line, we introduce a novel notion of $\sqcap'$-tractability in this paper. Inspired by some technologies used to deal big data, we place a restriction on preprocessing function, which limits the function to produce a relatively small database as output, at most polylog-size of the input database. At the same time, we bound the redundancy information when re-factorizing data and queries for preprocessing. These changes aim to make our theory more closely linked to practice. We set two complexity classes to denote the classes of Boolean queries that are $\sqcap'$-tractable themselves and that can be made $\sqcap'$-tractable, respectively. Based on a new factorization in our complexity classes, we investigate two reductions, which differ from whether allowing re-factorizing data and query parts. We verify the transitive and compatible properties of the reductions and analysis the complete problems and sizes of the complexity classes. We conclude that all PTIME classes of Boolean queries can be made $\sqcap'$-tractable, similar to that of the $\sqcap$-tractability theory. With a little surprise, we prove that the set of all $\sqcap'$-tractable queries is strictly smaller than that of all $\sqcap$-tractable queries, and thus the set of $\sqcap'$-tractable queries is properly contained in that of PTIME queries. In this way, we attain a new complexity class inside the complexity class of PTIME queries.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiannan Yang, Hanpin Wang, Yongzhi Cao. 2015-10-01. Making problems tractable on big data via preprocessing with polylog-size output. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00229

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC↗