Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1510.00682

The $\mathcal{G}$-invariant and catenary data of a matroid

Abstract

The catenary data of a matroid $M$ of rank $r$ on $n$ elements is the vector $(ν(M;a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_r))$, indexed by compositions $(a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_r)$, where $a_0 \geq 0$,\, $a_i > 0$ for $i \geq 1$, and $a_0+ a_1 + \cdots + a_r = n$, with the coordinate $ν(M;a_0,a_1, \ldots,a_r)$ equal to the number of maximal chains or flags $(X_0,X_1, \ldots,X_r)$ of flats or closed sets such that $X_i$ has rank $i$,\, $|X_0| = a_0$, and $|X_i - X_{i-1}| = a_i$. We show that the catenary data of $M$ contains the same information about $M$ as its $\mathcal{G}$-invariant, which was defined by H. Derksen [\emph{J.\ Algebr.\ Combin.}\ 30 (2009) 43--86]. The Tutte polynomial is a specialization of the $\mathcal{G}$-invariant. We show that many known results for the Tutte polynomial have analogs for the $\mathcal{G}$-invariant. In particular, we show that for many matroid constructions, the $\mathcal{G}$-invariant of the construction can be calculated from the $\mathcal{G}$-invariants of the constituents and that the $\mathcal{G}$-invariant of a matroid can be calculated from its size, the isomorphism class of the lattice of cyclic flats with lattice elements labeled by the rank and size of the underlying set. We also show that the number of flats and cyclic flats of a given rank and size can be derived from the $\mathcal{G}$-invariant, that the $\mathcal{G}$-invariant of $M$ is reconstructible from the deck of $\mathcal{G}$-invariants of restrictions of $M$ to its copoints, and that, apart from free extensions and coextensions, one can detect whether a matroid is a free product from its $\mathcal{G}$-invariant.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Joseph E. Bonin, Joseph P. S. Kung. 2025-02-11. The $\mathcal{G}$-invariant and catenary data of a matroid. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2017.03.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO