Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1510.01549

A Non-Sieving Application of the Euler Zeta Function

Abstract

One familiar with the Euler zeta function, which established the remarkable relationship between the prime and composite numbers, might naturally ponder the results of the application of this special function in cases where there is no known way to sieve composite numbers out of the product term in this famous equation. Such would be case when an infinite series of numbers to be analyzed are calculated by a polynomial expression that yields successively increasing positive integer values and which has as its input domain the positive integers themselves. In such cases there may not be an intuitive way to eliminate the composite terms from the product term on the right-hand side of the Euler zeta function equation by either scaling a previous prime number calculation or by employing predictable values of the domain of the function which would make future outputs of the polynomial prime. So the best one may be able to hope for in this case is to determine some value to be added or subtracted from unity in the numerator above the product term to make both sides of the equation equal in the hope that that value can be used to predict the number of prime numbers that exist as outputs of the polynomial function for some limit less than or equal to x of the input domain.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael P. May. 2023-04-11. A Non-Sieving Application of the Euler Zeta Function. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.01549

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Transcendence Meets Normality: Construction of Transcendentally Normal Numbers

In this work, we study real numbers $x$ for which $p(x)$ is (absolutely) normal for every non-constant integer-valued polynomial $p$. We call such numbers transcendentally normal. We prove that almost every real number is transcendentally normal and provide an explicit construction of such a number, based on Sierpinski's covering method and novel ideas involving the so-called stretch function. In the next step, we transform this construction into an algorithm that computes the digits of a t-normal number recursively in all integer bases. Moreover, we extend our covering approach to construct and compute LIL-normal numbers whose discrepancies are of the order predicted by the law of the iterated logarithm. We also take the opportunity to discuss several interesting open problems.

math.NT