Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1510.02393

Value Automata with Filters

Michaël Cadilhac·Andreas Krebs·Nutan Limaye
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We propose to study value automata with filters, a natural generalization of regular cost automata to nondeterminism. Models such as weighted automata and Parikh automata appear naturally as specializations. Results on the expressiveness of this model offer a general understanding of the behavior of the models that arise as special cases. A landscape of such restrictions is drawn.

Explore related subjects

cs.FL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michaël Cadilhac, Andreas Krebs, Nutan Limaye. 2015-10-08. Value Automata with Filters. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Simple grammar bisimilarity, with an application to session type equivalence

We provide an algorithm for deciding simple grammar bisimilarity whose complexity is polynomial in the valuation of the grammar (maximum seminorm among production rules). Since the valuation is at most exponential in the size of the grammar, this gives rise to a (single) exponential running time. Previously only a double-exponential algorithm was known. As an application, we provide a conversion from context-free session types to simple grammars whose valuation is linear in the size of the type. In this way, we provide the first polynomial-time algorithm for deciding context-free session type equivalence.

cs.FL↗
arXiv2026

Testing and Learning Symbolic Finite State Machines

Symbolic finite state machines (SFSMs) describe input/output behaviour using guards and output assignments with possibly infinite data domains. We study deterministic and completely specified SFSMs whose guards and output assignments depend only on the current input. We define finite representative input sets that contain witnesses for relevant guard overlaps and separating witnesses for output assignments that differ on those overlaps. Our main theorem shows that language equivalence of the finite instantiations implies language equivalence over the full input domain. This result transfers complete testing methods for deterministic finite state machines (DFSMs) to SFSMs, provided finite sets of admissible guards and output assignments and an upper bound on the number of distinguishable reachable states are known. Under these assumptions, a DFSM learner with complete testing can learn a finite instantiation, which is then lifted to an equivalent SFSM. We establish a bound on the size of representative input sets and give an SMT construction whose correctness and termination hold under stated solver assumptions.

cs.FL↗
arXiv2026

A Myhill-Nerode Theorem for Generalized Automata, with Applications to Pattern Matching and Compression

The model of generalized automata, introduced by Eilenberg in 1974, allows representing a regular language more concisely than conventional automata by allowing edges to be labeled not only with characters, but also strings. Giammarresi and Montalbano introduced a notion of determinism for generalized automata [STACS 1995]. While generalized deterministic automata retain many properties of conventional deterministic automata, the uniqueness of a minimal generalized deterministic automaton is lost. In the first part of the paper, we show that the lack of uniqueness can be explained by introducing a set $ \mathcal{W(A)} $ associated with a generalized automaton $ \mathcal{A} $. In this way, we derive for the first time a full Myhill-Nerode theorem for generalized automata, which contains the textbook Myhill-Nerode theorem for conventional automata as a degenerate case. In the second part of the paper, we show that the set $ \mathcal{W(A)} $ leads to applications for pattern matching and data compression. We show that a Wheeler generalized automata can be stored using $ \mathfrak{e} \log σ(1 + o(1)) + O(e) $ bits so that pattern matching queries can be solved in $ O(m \log \log σ) $ time, where $ \mathfrak{e} $ is the total length of all edge labels, $ e $ is the number of edges, $ σ$ is the size of the alphabet and $ m $ is the length of the pattern.

cs.FL↗