Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1510.02639

The Price of Connectivity for Feedback Vertex Set

Abstract

Let fvs$(G)$ and cfvs(G) denote the cardinalities of a minimum feedback vertex set and a minimum connected feedback vertex set of a graph $G$, respectively. The price of connectivity for feedback vertex set (poc-fvs) for a class of graphs ${\cal G}$ is defined as the maximum ratio $\mbox{cfvs}(G)/\mbox{fvs}(G)$ over all connected graphs $G\in {\cal G}$. We study the poc-fvs for graph classes defined by a finite family ${\cal H}$ of forbidden induced subgraphs. We characterize exactly those finite families ${\cal H}$ for which the poc-fvs for ${\cal H}$-free graphs is upper bounded by a constant. Additionally, for the case where $|{\cal H}|=1$, we determine exactly those graphs $H$ for which there exists a constant $c_H$ such that $\mbox{cfvs}(G)\leq \mbox{fvs}(G) + c_H$ for every connected $H$-free graph $G$, as well as exactly those graphs $H$ for which we can take $c_H=0$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rémy Belmonte, Pim van 't Hof, Marcin Kamiński, Daniël Paulusma. 2015-10-09. The Price of Connectivity for Feedback Vertex Set. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02639

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO