Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1510.05334

On the Structure of Quintic Polynomials

Abstract

We study the structure of bounded degree polynomials over finite fields. Haramaty and Shpilka [STOC 2010] showed that biased degree three or four polynomials admit a strong structural property. We confirm that this is the case for degree five polynomials also. Let $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{F}_q$ be a prime field. [1.] Suppose $f:\mathbb{F}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{F}$ is a degree five polynomial with bias(f)=δ. Then f can be written in the form $f= \sum_{i=1}^{c} G_i H_i + Q$, where $G_i$ and $H_i$s are nonconstant polynomials satisfying $deg(G_i)+deg(H_i)\leq 5$ and $Q$ is a degree $\leq 4$ polynomial. Moreover, $c=c(δ)$ does not depend on $n$ and $q$. [2.] Suppose $f:\mathbb{F}^n\rightarrow \mathbb{F}$ is a degree five polynomial with $bias(f)=δ$. Then there exists an $Ω_δ(n)$ dimensional affine subspace $V$ of $\mathbb{F}^n$ such that $f$ restricted to $V$ is a constant. Cohen and Tal [Random 2015] proved that biased polynomials of degree at most four are constant on a subspace of dimension $Ω(n)$. Item [2.] extends this to degree five polynomials. A corollary to Item [2.] is that any degree five affine disperser for dimension $k$ is also an affine extractor for dimension $O(k)$. We note that Item [2.] cannot hold for degrees six or higher. We obtain our results for degree five polynomials as a special case of structure theorems that we prove for biased degree d polynomials when $d<|\mathbb{F}|+4$. While the $d<|\mathbb{F}|+4$ assumption seems very restrictive, we note that prior to our work such structure theorems were only known for $d<|\mathbb{F}|$ by Green and Tao [Contrib. Discrete Math. 2009] and Bhowmick and Lovett [arXiv:1506.02047]. Using algorithmic regularity lemmas for polynomials developed by Bhattacharyya, et. al. [SODA 2015], we show that whenever such a strong structure exists, it can be found algorithmically in time polynomial in n.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pooya Hatami. 2015-10-19. On the Structure of Quintic Polynomials. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.05334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Orthogonal Pairs in Maps from the Sphere to the Circle

We prove that, for any $f:S^2\to S^1$ and any $\varepsilon>0$, there exist orthogonal vectors $x,y\in S^2$ such that the length of the shortest arc between $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ is at most $π/2 +\varepsilon$. This proves a conjecture of Ghebleh from 2007 that the circular chromatic number of the real orthogonality graph is equal to four.

math.CO

Exact Area-Range Minima in the Quantitative Monsky Problem for Five and Seven Triangles

For a dissection $D$ of the unit square into $n$ nondegenerate triangles, let $R(D)=\max_i a_i-\min_i a_i, Δ(n)=\inf_D R(D).$ We prove that this infimum is attained for every $n\ge2$, and determine the exact minima for $n=5$ and $n=7$, allowing T-junctions. For five triangles, $Δ(5)=\frac{5\sqrt5-11}{8};$ equality holds precisely when three areas equal $(3-\sqrt5)/4$ and two equal $(3\sqrt5-5)/8$. For seven triangles, $Δ(7)=r_7$, where $r_7$ is the unique root in $(0,1/4900)$ of $864r^4+2160r^3-6060r^2+4972r-1.$ Every minimizer has four areas $(1+3r_7)/7$ and three areas $(1-4r_7)/7$, although its geometry need not be unique. The proofs combine finite combinatorial classification with exact symbolic and integer-interval certificates. For nine triangles, a tilted-strip construction gives the explicit algebraic upper bound $Δ(9)\le 0.0001273496861283553341\ldots,$ which is the exact minimum within that topology. Conversely, every dissection in the complete single-cap two-rail zig-zag family, with arbitrary continuous areas, has range greater than $1/3500$; hence a global minimizer must lie outside that family. The exact value of $Δ(9)$ remains open.

math.CO

Chromatic symmetric functions for annular webs

We introduce a combinatorial definition of chromatic symmetric functions for annular webs. We prove their symmetry by constructing a web analogue of the Shareshian--Wachs involution and show that they coincide with the symmetric functions associated to annular webs via Turaev's isomorphism. We then derive explicit formulas for their hook Schur coefficients. We also introduce web LLT functions, whose hook Schur coefficients admit positive Laurent-polynomial formulas. These formulas yield a combinatorial expression for the coefficients of the HOMFLY--PT polynomial of an annular web.

math.CO