Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1511.06436

On the robust hardness of Gröbner basis computation

Abstract

The computation of Gröbner bases is an established hard problem. By contrast with many other problems, however, there has been little investigation of whether this hardness is robust. In this paper, we frame and present results on the problem of approximate computation of Gröbner bases. We show that it is NP-hard to construct a Gröbner basis of the ideal generated by a set of polynomials, even when the algorithm is allowed to discard a $(1 - ε)$ fraction of the generators, and likewise when the algorithm is allowed to discard variables (and the generators containing them). Our results shows that computation of Gröbner bases is robustly hard even for simple polynomial systems (e.g. maximum degree 2, with at most 3 variables per generator). We conclude by greatly strengthening results for the Strong $c$-Partial Gröbner problem posed by De Loera et al. Our proofs also establish interesting connections between the robust hardness of Gröbner bases and that of SAT variants and graph-coloring.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gwen Spencer, David Rolnick. 2018-07-16. On the robust hardness of Gröbner basis computation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06436

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Parallel Integration over Simple Radical Extensions II: Mixed Towers

In Part I we extended the structure theorems underlying the Risch--Norman (parallel Risch) method to a simple radical extension $L=K(y)$, $y^m=q$, of a differential field $K=F(t_1,\dots,t_n)$ closed under the derivation. Here we remove the closure hypothesis: the radical may occupy any position in the tower, so that the derivatives of the generators above it involve $y$ --- the setting of Bronstein's algorithm for mixed elementary functions. The working ring is $\cA=\cO[t_{j+1},\dots,t_n]$, the integral closure of $F[t_1,\dots,t_n]$ in $L$: a Krull domain, free over the polynomial ring on Trager's basis, so that all factorisation remains in a unique factorisation domain. The denominator of the derivation is no longer an element but a divisor $\fd_D$ on $\cA$, and the valuation lemma takes the unified form $v_P(Dg)=v_P(g)-(1+v_P(\fd_D))$ at normal height-one primes, subsuming the shifts $\{1,e_P\}$ of Part I; the proof localises and requires no cancellation analysis. Stability of the class group and the unit group, $\Cl(\cA)\cong\Cl(\cO)$ and $\cA^*=\cO^*$, splits the admissible logands into $S$-units of $\cO$ --- computed by the machinery of Part I --- and irreducible polynomials moving in the upper variables, whose residues must be constants. We prove degree bounds in the top variable and describe the resulting algorithm, which --- unlike the classical parallel method, whose failure proves nothing --- returns certificates of non-elementarity in two situations: a residue outside the constant field, and, when every bound in force is proved, a residue-free remainder that the linear system shows to be non-exact.

cs.SC

Parallel Integration over Simple Radical Extensions in Mixed Towers: Charlwood's Integrals

We evaluate a SymPy implementation of the parallel Risch-Norman method using Charlwood's 2008 suite of 50 challenging indefinite integrals. The system automatically builds integrand towers, verifies answers by differentiation, and returns correct, verified integrals for 49 problems with zero errors. The single failure, $\int\arcsin(x\sqrt{1-x^2})\,dx$, is proven non-elementary using a holomorphic-remainder certificate, though limited by an unverified completeness hypothesis on a genus-three curve. Part II's degree bounds successfully reduce classical ansatz sizes by two-thirds without impacting running time. The paper details algorithmic mechanisms like $S'$-units, Pell units, and residue computing in tower coordinates. Compared to mature implementations, this untuned SymPy prototype is slower than FriCAS (by a factor of six on the median integral) but more accurate than AXIOM (which returned three wrong answers). Profiling pinpoints performance bottlenecks in nonlinear norm searches and nested number fields, outlining clear targets for optimisation.

cs.SC

Resultant Tools for Parametric Polynomial Systems with Application to Mathematical Biology

To decompose the parameter space of a parametric system of polynomial equations with respect to the number of real solutions that the system attains, first the discriminant variety of the system should be computed. This is an elimination type problem because the discriminant variety is the union of the projections into the parameter space of the intersection of the variety of the original system with one or several new hypersurfaces. Despite the popularity of Gröbner Bases (GBs) for this task, in this work we focus on a lesser used alternative tool, namely resultants. We develop new approaches to build the discriminant variety using different resultant methods such as Dixon resultant and iterated univariate resultants. We discuss how the minimal discriminant variety, the discriminant varieties computed by our methods, and the known border polynomials are related. We demonstrate with numerous examples from population dynamics and chemical reaction network theory that our new approach successfully handles larger size examples than a GB can.

cs.SC