Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1511.06689

Is there a computable upper bound on the heights of rational solutions of a Diophantine equation with a finite number of solutions?

Abstract

The height of a rational number $p/q$ is denoted by $h(p/q)$ and equals $\text{max}(|p|,|q|)$ provided p/q is written in lowest terms. The height of a rational tuple $(x_1,...,x_n)$ is denoted by $h(x_1,...,x_n)$ and equals $\text{max}(h(x_1),...,h(x_n))$. Let $G_n={x_i+1=x_k: i,k \in {1,...,n}} \cup {x_i \cdot x_j=x_k: i,j,k \in {1,...,n}}$. Let $f(1)=1$, and let $f(n+1)=2^{(2^{(f(n))})}$ for every positive integer n. We conjecture: (1) if a system $S \subseteq G_n$ has only finitely many solutions in rationals $x_1,...,x_n$, then each such solution $(x_1,...,x_n)$ satisfies $h(x_1,...,x_n) \leq {1 (\text{if} n=1), 2^{(2^{(n-2)})} (\text{if} n>1)}$; (2) if a system $S \subseteq G_n$ has only finitely many solutions in non-negative rationals $x_1,...,x_n$, then each such solution $(x_1,...,x_n)$ satisfies $h(x_1,...,x_n) \leq f(2n)$. We prove: (1) both conjectures imply that there exists an algorithm which takes as input a Diophantine equation, returns an integer, and this integer is greater than the heights of rational solutions, if the solution set is finite; (2) both conjectures imply that the question whether or not a given Diophantine equation has only finitely many rational solutions is decidable by a single query to an oracle that decides whether or not a given Diophantine equation has a rational solution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Apoloniusz Tyszka. 2017-09-18. Is there a computable upper bound on the heights of rational solutions of a Diophantine equation with a finite number of solutions?. https://doi.org/10.15439/2017f42

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT