Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1511.08784

On the number of distinct prime factors of a sum of super-powers

Abstract

Given $k, \ell \in {\bf N}^+$, let $x_{i,j}$ be, for $1 \le i \le k$ and $0 \le j \le \ell$, some fixed integers, and define, for every $n \in {\bf N}^+$, $s_n := \sum_{i=1}^k \prod_{j=0}^\ell x_{i,j}^{n^j}$. We prove that the following are equivalent: (a) There are a real $θ> 1$ and infinitely many indices $n$ for which the number of distinct prime factors of $s_n$ is greater than the super-logarithm of $n$ to base $θ$. (b) There do not exist non-zero integers $a_0,b_0,\ldots,a_\ell,b_\ell $ such that $s_{2n}=\prod_{i=0}^\ell a_i^{(2n)^i}$ and $s_{2n-1}=\prod_{i=0}^\ell b_i^{(2n-1)^i}$ for all $n$. We will give two different proofs of this result, one based on a theorem of Evertse (yielding, for a fixed finite set of primes $\mathcal S$, an effective bound on the number of non-degenerate solutions of an $\mathcal S$-unit equation in $k$ variables over the rationals) and the other using only elementary methods. As a corollary, we find that, for fixed $c_1, x_1, \ldots,c_k, x_k \in \mathbf N^+$, the number of distinct prime factors of $c_1 x_1^n+\cdots+c_k x_k^n$ is bounded, as $n$ ranges over $\mathbf N^+$, if and only if $x_1=\cdots=x_k$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paolo Leonetti, Salvatore Tringali. 2017-11-18. On the number of distinct prime factors of a sum of super-powers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2017.10.002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT