Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1512.01270

More on the Nonexistence of Odd Perfect Numbers of a Certain Form

Abstract

Euler showed that if an odd perfect number exists, it must be of the form $N = p^αq_{1}^{2β_{1}}$ $\ldots$ $q_{k}^{2β_{k}}$, where $p, q_{1}, \ldots, q_k$ are distinct odd primes, $α$, $β_{i} \geq 1$, for $1 \leq i \leq k$, with $p \equiv α\equiv 1 \pmod{4}$. In 2005, Evans and Pearlman showed that $N$ is not perfect, if $3|N$ or $7|N$ and each $β_{i} \equiv 2 \pmod{5}$. We improve on this result by removing the hypothesis that $3|N$ or $7|N$ and show that $N$ is not perfect, simply, if each $β_{i} \equiv 2 \pmod{5}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Patrick Brown. 2015-12-03. More on the Nonexistence of Odd Perfect Numbers of a Certain Form. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.01270

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT