Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1512.05651

Pragmatic Information in Quantum Mechanics

Juan G. Roederer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

An objective definition of pragmatic information and the consideration of recent results about information processing in the human brain can help overcome some traditional difficulties with the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rather than attempting to define information ab initio, I introduce the concept of interaction between material bodies as a primary concept. Two distinct categories can be identified: 1) Interactions which can always be reduced to a superposition of physical interactions (forces) between elementary constituents; 2) Interactions between complex bodies which cannot be reduced to a superposition of interactions between parts, and in which patterns and forms (in space and/or time) play the determining role. Pragmatic information is then defined as the correspondence between a given pattern and the ensuing pattern-specific change. I will show that pragmatic information is a biological concept that plays no active role in the purely physical domain; it only does so when a living organism intervenes. The consequences for the foundations of both classical and quantum physics are important and will be discussed in detail. Since by its very definition pragmatic information (the one our brain uses to represent, think about and react to the outside world)cannot operate in the quantum domain, it is advisable to refrain from using it in our mental representation of what is happening 'inside' a quantum system. Although the theoretical framework developed for quantum mechanics handles mathematical entities specifically attributed to a quantum system, the only truly pragmatic information it can provide relates to macroscopic effects on the environment (natural, or artificial as in a measurement instrument) with which the system interacts.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-phquant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juan G. Roederer. 2016-04-07. Pragmatic Information in Quantum Mechanics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05651

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Piezoelectricity: A Brief History of its Discovery and Physical Principles Using the Example of Low Quartz

Piezoelectricity is a key phenomenon in solid-state physics and has significant technological relevance. In teaching, however, it is often treated either without a historical context or an explicit link to the microscopic crystal structure, meaning that a crucial level of understanding remains untapped. This study combines the history of the discovery of piezoelectricity with its physical description within a didactically coherent framework. Building on the work of the brothers, Jacques and Pierre Curie (1880 - 1882), it demonstrated how investigations into pyroelectricity led to the identification of polarization induced by mechanical compression in hemihedral crystals such as tourmaline and quartz. The development from early qualitative experiments towards the first quantitative determination of piezoelectric constants is traced in a structured manner. Using low quartz as an example, the microscopic cause of piezoelectricity was attributed to the asymmetric displacements of silicon and oxygen ions within the orthosilicate ion tetrahedral network. This leads to the formation of macroscopic polarization owing to uncompensated dipole moments in the crystal lattice. The direct and reciprocal piezoelectric effects are qualitatively distinguished and discussed in the context of mechanical-electrical coupling. The article is aimed at students in physics and engineering as well as lecturers. It was conceived as a didactic review article (tutorial article) and serves as a structured introduction to the physical and historical foundations of piezoelectricity.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

$δ$-flatness and its natural extension

What, if anything, makes Minkowski spacetime a privileged local reference geometry in General Relativity? Recent work by \cite{WeatherallFletcher} argues: nothing. In response, I proposed a criterion of ``$δ$-flatness'', which bounds the magnitude of tidal acceleration within a tubular neighborhood by $δ$, and showed that Minkowski uniquely saturates the bound. Here I ask how $δ$-flatness generalises, and distinguish two kinds of extension. Reference-metric generalisations compare physical tidal acceleration with a reference tidal-force term constructed from another metric. Lorentzian signature obstructs every such comparison in which the reference fails to share the lightcones of the physical metric. Criterion modifications instead build the criterion from the physical geometry alone. The space of such modifications is wide, and I focus on those closest to $δ$-flatness, where one bounds the deviation of tidal acceleration from a non-zero target. The minimal candidate, which I call $δ$-MSS, has a singular limit that picks out the maximally symmetric spacetimes (Minkowski, de Sitter, Anti-de Sitter) via Schur's theorem. A restricted variant, which compares $g$ with a conformal rescaling of itself, either collapses to $δ$-MSS or fails to pick out a unique geometry. The chief result is that $δ$-flatness distinguishes Minkowski with no free parameter. $δ$-MSS, a weaker variant, picks out the maximally symmetric family at the cost of an externally supplied scalar.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

The Price of Removing the Scaffolding: Maxwell wrote something about Amp`ere that years later would be done to him

In the history of physics, the name scaffolding has been given to whatever served to raise a theory and is afterwards removed because, it is said, it is no longer needed. This article documents, from the originals, what it cost Maxwell's theory when that method was applied to it: what was removed from it, who did it, with what argument, and how over the years it had to be recovered because it was understood that it was needed after all. It also records what Maxwell himself missed in Amp`ere, what he calls the traces of the scaffolding: the template with which Amp`ere himself had given shape to his work.

physics.hist-ph↗