Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1512.06942

Termination of canonical context-sensitive rewriting and productivity of rewrite systems

Salvador Lucas
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Termination of programs, i.e., the absence of infinite computations, ensures the existence of normal forms for all initial expressions, thus providing an essential ingredient for the definition of a normalization semantics for functional programs. In lazy functional languages, though, infinite data structures are often delivered as the outcome of computations. For instance, the list of all prime numbers can be returned as a neverending stream of numerical expressions or data structures. If such streams are allowed, requiring termination is hopeless. In this setting, the notion of productivity can be used to provide an account of computations with infinite data structures, as it "captures the idea of computability, of progress of infinite-list programs" (B.A. Sijtsma, On the Productivity of Recursive List Definitions, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 11(4):633-649, 1989). However, in the realm of Term Rewriting Systems, which can be seen as (first-order, untyped, unconditional) functional programs, termination of Context-Sensitive Rewriting (CSR) has been showed equivalent to productivity of rewrite systems through appropriate transformations. In this way, tools for proving termination of CSR can be used to prove productivity. In term rewriting, CSR is the restriction of rewriting that arises when reductions are allowed on selected arguments of function symbols only. In this paper we show that well-known results about the computational power of CSR are useful to better understand the existing connections between productivity of rewrite systems and termination of CSR, and also to obtain more powerful techniques to prove productivity of rewrite systems.

Explore related subjects

cs.PLcs.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Salvador Lucas. 2015-12-22. Termination of canonical context-sensitive rewriting and productivity of rewrite systems. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.200.2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Schedules Are Solvable Symbols: Tuning-Free Compilation of Tile Programs on Dataflow Architectures

Modern AI and HPC accelerators increasingly expose dataflow features: software-visible mechanisms for data movement and overlap, such as inter-core communication through the on-chip network and intra-core asynchronous pipelining. These features shift scheduling responsibility from hardware to the compiler, and because placement, movement, and synchronization become software-visible, they also make the performance of static schedules predictable. Yet high performance on such hardware still relies on vendor-engineered kernel libraries or profile-based auto-tuning, whose embedded expert knowledge transfers poorly across architectures and algorithms. We present Loom, a tuning-free symbolic compiler framework for tile-based SPMD programs on spatial dataflow architectures. The central idea is to treat tile-based SPMD compilation as a hardware-explicit static optimization problem. Loom enumerates discrete spatial-mapping and communication candidates while keeping value parameters, such as tiling factors and pipeline knobs, symbolic within each candidate. From an explicit hardware description, it derives symbolic legality constraints and latency expressions, formulates one CP-SAT problem per schedule candidate, and jointly solves inter-core dataflow, intra-core asynchronous scheduling, and block sizes at compile time. On two Tenstorrent generations, Wormhole and Blackhole, Loom matches or exceeds the vendor-optimized TTNN library on GEMM, Flash Attention, and Flash Decode, out of the box and without per-shape profiling or profile-based platform-specific schedule tuning. These results suggest that hardware-derived symbolic compilation provides a retargetable alternative to profiling-based tuning for spatial dataflow architectures while remaining interpretable by keeping optimization decisions traceable to source-level symbols.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

ProofGap: Benchmarking Step-Level Formal Reasoning with Local Obligations Derived from Natural-Language Solutions

Existing formal mathematics benchmarks, such as miniF2F, ProofNet, and PutnamBench, primarily evaluate models on constructing complete formal proofs for challenging problems. Because success is measured at the theorem level, these benchmarks offer limited insight into models' step-level formal reasoning. Evaluating this capability separately enables finer-grained diagnosis of model limitations than theorem-level evaluation alone. To fill this evaluation gap, we introduce ProofGap, a fine-grained benchmark for step-level formal reasoning. ProofGap is constructed through a natural-language proof-processing pipeline that decomposes each reasoning step into one or more aligned proof gaps. Applying this pipeline to natural-language solutions to 3,015 exercises in B. P. Demidovich's Problems in Mathematical Analysis yields 26,116 gaps. The benchmark focuses on mathematical analysis, a domain that remains challenging for current models. By supplying the local context and target explicitly, gap completion isolates local formal proof construction from end-to-end proof composition, enabling more precise localization of model failures. Natural-language solutions serve as the provenance of these obligations, while the benchmark task itself starts from an already formalized local context and goal. Beyond benchmarking, the same pipeline may support future proof-verification systems, provided that semantic translation and sequential proof composition are handled reliably.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

DueList: A Theory of Lists with Combinators for SMT Solvers

Formal verification tools commonly rely on SMT solvers to automatically reason about programs, leveraging a range of logical theories, e.g., linear integer arithmetic, arrays, or strings, to encode program constructs and verification conditions. Despite recent advances, such solvers still struggle when reasoning about recursive data structures such as lists, which are pervasive in modern functional languages. Additionally, lists are commonly used in conjunction with higher-order combinators to, e.g., generically apply a function to all elements of the list. In this work, we provide first-class support for reasoning about lists within SMT solvers. We focus on lists of arbitrary size that, following the map-reduce paradigm, can be manipulated exclusively through a set of abstract combinators. To this end, we introduce DueList, an abstraction-refinement approach geared towards list reasoning, which we implement on top of off-the-shelf SMT solvers. To evaluate the efficiency of our approach, we assemble a diverse set of 752 benchmarks curated from previous works and real-world programs, and compare DueList against state-of-the-art solvers such as Z3 and CVC5. Our experimental evaluation shows that DueList extends reasoning facilities of existing solvers, allowing to conclude about the (un)satisfiability of a larger range of problems, while outperforming existing solvers in the vast majority of previously supported cases.

cs.PL↗