Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1512.07654

Mixed-Criticality Scheduling with I/O

Eric Missimer·Katherine Zhao·Richard West
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of scheduling tasks with different criticality levels in the presence of I/O requests. In mixed-criticality scheduling, higher criticality tasks are given precedence over those of lower criticality when it is impossible to guarantee the schedulability of all tasks. While mixed-criticality scheduling has gained attention in recent years, most approaches typically assume a periodic task model. This assumption does not always hold in practice, especially for real-time and embedded systems that perform I/O. For example, many tasks block on I/O requests until devices signal their completion via interrupts; both the arrival of interrupts and the waking of blocked tasks can be aperiodic. In our prior work, we developed a scheduling technique in the Quest real-time operating system, which integrates the time-budgeted management of I/O operations with Sporadic Server scheduling of tasks. This paper extends our previous scheduling approach with support for mixed-criticality tasks and I/O requests on the same processing core. Results show the effective schedulability of different task sets in the presence of I/O requests is superior in our approach compared to traditional methods that manage I/O using techniques such as Sporadic Servers.

Explore related subjects

cs.OS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eric Missimer, Katherine Zhao, Richard West. 2016-03-12. Mixed-Criticality Scheduling with I/O. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07654

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Don't Let AI Agents YOLO Your Files: Information and Control in Agent-Native Filesystems

AI coding agents regularly misuse their filesystem access, causing data corruption, loss, and leakage. We conduct the first systematic study of this problem through an analysis of 290 public reports. Our study reveals two fundamental gaps: users and agents have limited information about filesystem effects and insufficient control over them. To close these gaps, we propose to shift information and control from agents to filesystems. We introduce agent-native filesystems and identify three primitives they should provide: introspect effects, undo mutations, and gate accesses. These primitives let agents operate autonomously while reserving user interaction for sensitive accesses and final review. We build YoloFS, an agent-native filesystem. YoloFS stages mutations until the user commits them, snapshots intermediate states for agent self-correction, and uses progressive permission to let users adapt access rules during execution. We evaluate YoloFS with a new methodology that captures interactions among the user, agent, and filesystem. On 11 tasks with hidden side effects, YoloFS enables agents to self-correct in 8 and stages all mutations for user review. On 112 routine tasks, YoloFS reduces user interaction while matching the baseline success rate. YoloFS is open-sourced at https://github.com/YoloFS/YoloFS.

cs.OS↗
arXiv2026

Netkit: Specializing Linux Packet Delivery for Container Networks

Cloud-native microservices architectures rely on network namespaces for isolation, with the overhead of container communications remaining a critical performance bottleneck. While colocating containers on the same host mitigates some of this overhead, it cannot match the performance of communication within a single network namespace. Existing solutions either require application rewrites or fail to support the full Linux network stack expected by containerized applications. In this paper, we present netkit, an eBPF-based datapath that specializes the Linux networking stack to eliminate redundant backlog queue traversals during network namespace transitions. netkit leverages eBPF to transparently redirect packets between namespaces, bypassing unnecessary buffering while preserving compatibility with existing container applications. Our implementation in the Linux kernel, integrated with minimal changes to the Cilium network plugin for Kubernetes, improves throughput by up to 37\% and achieves parity between container-to-container and process-to-process communications, effectively closing the performance gap introduced by namespace isolation.

cs.OS↗
arXiv2026

Grouper: Scheduling Groups for Multi-Tenant Microsecond-Scale Microservices

Microsecond-scale core allocation makes colocating latency-critical services with batch work worthwhile. A thread that finds no work parks within microseconds and its core goes to a batch task. Putting one back costs $\sim$18 $μ$s, as the allocator must discover that a core is wanted and then take it from the batch task holding it. A monolith pays that tax once per request, a microservice chain pays it at every hop in both directions, and a multi-tenant host multiplies it again, because every tenant's hops queue at the same allocator. On our port of DeathStarBench's hotelReservation, going from two tenants to ten takes a hop from 39 to 222 $μ$s and a 10-RPC path's median from 456 to 2,445 $μ$s, a fivefold degradation even though no tenant's own load changed. We introduce Grouper and the scheduling group, a set of isolated runtimes that the allocator treats as one allocation and accounting unit, whose members may hand cores directly to one another. A service sending an RPC donates its core to the peer through an unprivileged kernel fast path, so the core follows the request through the call graph. The allocator retains control through reconciliation, core-addressed revocation and a pooled budget but leaves the critical path; its load falls from $Θ(R \cdot H)$ to $Θ(R)$ in request rate $R$ and hop count $H$. Over a grid of two to ten tenants at 1,000-30,000 requests per second each, Grouper outperforms Caladan (the allocator Junction also builds on) and Linux by up to 7.9$\times$ and 3.4$\times$ at the median and 4.1$\times$ and 14.2$\times$ at the tail, and leaves batch work more throughput than Caladan at over 70% of load points.

cs.OS↗