Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1512.08041

Improved Algorithms for Exact and Approximate Boolean Matrix Decomposition

Abstract

An arbitrary $m\times n$ Boolean matrix $M$ can be decomposed {\em exactly} as $M =U\circ V$, where $U$ (resp. $V$) is an $m\times k$ (resp. $k\times n$) Boolean matrix and $\circ$ denotes the Boolean matrix multiplication operator. We first prove an exact formula for the Boolean matrix $J$ such that $M =M\circ J^T$ holds, where $J$ is maximal in the sense that if any 0 element in $J$ is changed to a 1 then this equality no longer holds. Since minimizing $k$ is NP-hard, we propose two heuristic algorithms for finding suboptimal but good decomposition. We measure the performance (in minimizing $k$) of our algorithms on several real datasets in comparison with other representative heuristic algorithms for Boolean matrix decomposition (BMD). The results on some popular benchmark datasets demonstrate that one of our proposed algorithms performs as well or better on most of them. Our algorithms have a number of other advantages: They are based on exact mathematical formula, which can be interpreted intuitively. They can be used for approximation as well with competitive "coverage." Last but not least, they also run very fast. Due to interpretability issues in data mining, we impose the condition, called the "column use condition," that the columns of the factor matrix $U$ must form a subset of the columns of $M$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuan Sun, Shiwei Ye, Yi Sun, Tsunehiko Kameda. 2015-12-25. Improved Algorithms for Exact and Approximate Boolean Matrix Decomposition. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.08041

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

UTVPI-representable integer point sets: discrete convexity, polymorphisms, and pairwise closure

We study subsets of the integer lattice represented by single-variable-per-inequality (SVPI), difference-constraint (DC), unit two-variable-per-inequality (UTVPI), and two-variable-per-inequality (TVPI) systems. We relate five viewpoints: inequality representation, discrete convexity, polymorphisms, reconstruction from two-coordinate projections, and fixed points of closure operators. Our central result completely characterizes UTVPI-representability. For every set $S\subseteq\mathbb Z^n$ with $n>1$, \[ \begin{aligned} &S\text{ is UTVPI-representable}\\ &\;\Longleftrightarrow\; S\text{ is closed under the directed midpoint and median operations}\\ &\;\Longleftrightarrow\; S\text{ is integrally convex and $2$-decomposable}. \end{aligned} \] The median condition may instead be replaced by closedness under some majority operation, and the same class is the fixed-point class of a pairwise directed-midpoint closure operator. Thus, all five viewpoints yield equivalent characterizations of UTVPI-representability. In particular, $2$-decomposability is exactly the global condition needed to lift the known two-dimensional equivalence between integral convexity and UTVPI-representability to arbitrary dimension. This theorem is embedded in a broader pairwise-closure theory. For a family $F$ of operations, we define a closure operator by closing every two-coordinate projection under $F$ and joining the resulting sets. Its fixed points are precisely the sets that are both $2$-decomposable and $F$-closed, and we establish a local-to-global criterion for such characterizations. A closed-convex-hull analogue characterizes TVPI-representability. We also characterize SVPI-representability by natural multioperations, prove limitations of operation-based characterizations for several related classes, and determine the complete inclusion hierarchies in the general, Boolean, and two-dimensional settings.

cs.DM

Integrality gap preserving reductions

We propose a framework for the systematic study of integrality gaps of combinatorial optimization problems with respect to a fixed linear programming formulation. The method, called \emph{integrality gap preserving reduction}, consists of iteratively shrinking the input universe of the problem while guaranteeing that gap-maximizing instances remain selected. When the subset of remaining instances becomes specific enough, we calculate the integrality gap explicitly. Besides applying integrality gap preserving reductions to three well-known optimization problems via their standard linear programming formulations (weighted vertex cover problem, multiple knapsack problem, and unrelated machine scheduling problem), we analyse the restricted assignment problem via its configuration LP relaxation. We prove that the integrality gap is equal to $1$ for three ``easy'' subclasses of the problem that are either solvable in polynomial time or admit a PTAS (e.g., the all-one processing time case). For some remaining cases, we improve the current lower bound using our technique.

cs.DM

Paired Disjunctive Domination Number of Middle Graphs

The concept of domination in graphs plays a central role in understanding structural properties and applications in network theory. In this study, we focus on the paired disjunctive domination number in the context of middle graphs, a transformation that captures both adjacency and incidence relations of the original graph. We begin by investigating this parameter for middle graphs of several special graph classes, including path graphs, cycle graphs, wheel graphs, complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, star graphs, friendship graphs, and double star graphs. We then present general results by establishing lower and upper bounds for the paired disjunctive domination number in middle graphs of arbitrary graphs, with particular emphasis on trees. Additionally, we determine the exact value of the parameter for middle graphs obtained through the join operation. These findings contribute to the broader understanding of domination-type parameters in transformed graph structures and offer new insights into their combinatorial behavior.

cs.DM