Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1602.03361

Digital Technologies In The Early Primary School Classroom

Abstract

Papert's (1980) work with Turtle Geometry offered an early and provocative vision of how digital technologies could be used with young learners. Since then, research on digital technology use has focused on the middle and high school levels. Given the increasing diversity of digital technologies, and their varied underlying pedagogical goals and design choices, Clements' (2002) claim that there is no single effect of the computer on mathematics achievement is as true now as it was a decade ago. However, many advances have been made in better articulating the range of design choices that are possible, their potential effect on the cognitive and affective dimensions on mathematics learning, and their varying demands on the teacher. The aim of this chapter is to summarise the research literature on the use of digital technologies in the teaching and learning of mathematics at the k-2 level. In particular, we focus on literature that contributes to our understanding of how the use of digital technologies affects and changes the teaching and learning of mathematics - that is, how different affordances and design choices impact on the way teachers and learners interact and express themselves mathematically. By digital technologies we refer to a range of tools including multi-purpose computer-based software programs, web-based applets, virtual manipulatives, programming languages, CD-ROMs, games, calculators, touchscreen applications and interactive whiteboards. The distinction between these various types is not always evident and, indeed, one goal of this chapter is to provide useful distinguishing features of these various technologies in order to help educators better evaluate and choose amongst them.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nathalie Sinclair, Anna Baccaglini-Frank. 2016-02-10. Digital Technologies In The Early Primary School Classroom. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448946

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Stairs of Reconciliation: A Mathematical Tourist in Graz

Inside the Grazer Burg, two late-Gothic stone flights rise about distinct spindles, overlap, share several treads, and separate again. Their plan is governed not by a coaxial double helix but, to first approximation, by two intersecting circles. This elementary geometry yields a model of recurrent meeting and makes explicit the compatibility conditions that meeting requires. It also leads to a second object that geometers call a double spiral staircase - the helicoid - and to a useful distinction between resemblance and identity. The staircase becomes a meditation on how paths, models, and disciplines can meet without becoming the same.

math.HO

On the Reconstruction of SAS from Other Triangle Congruence Criteria

Starting from a Hilbert plane and removing the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) congruence axiom, we investigate to what extent SAS can be recovered synthetically from the remaining classical triangle congruence criteria. We show that the Angle-Side-Angle criterion, together with a ray correspondence principle corresponding to Theorem 13 of Hilbert's \emph{Grundlagen der Geometrie}, suffices to reconstruct SAS. We further show that both the Side-Side-Side and the Side-Angle-Angle criteria also suffice, once combined with the ray correspondence principle and suitable auxiliary principles -- the existence of midpoints and a hypotenuse-angle criterion for right triangles in the first case, and the existence of angle bisectors, the congruence of supplements of congruent angles, and the Pons Asinorum in the second. Although the two routes rely on auxiliary principles of different character, we show that they converge on a single final argument once a common hypotenuse-angle criterion is established. A metamathematical analysis, based on an explicit model adapted from Hilbert's own independence construction, complements these reconstructions: it shows that the ray correspondence principle alone cannot reconstruct any of the classical criteria, and that the Pons Asinorum and the hypotenuse-angle criterion are each independent of the remaining auxiliary principles used in their respective reconstructions. The resulting picture is not a formal hierarchy of the congruence criteria, but it does show that the Angle-Side-Angle reconstruction rests on a provably more economical basis than those obtained from Side-Side-Side or Side-Angle-Angle.

math.HO

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO