Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1604.08435

Hilbert-Kunz functions of surface rings of type ADE

Daniel Brinkmann
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this thesis we compute the Hilbert-Kunz functions of two-dimensional rings of type ADE by using representations of their indecomposable, maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules in terms of matrix factorizations, and as first syzygy modules of homogeneous ideals. For these computations we need to compute the Hilbert-series of the involved first syzygy modules as well as the fact that the surface rings of type ADE defined over the complex numbers are the rings of invariants of C[x,y] under actions defined by the finite subgroups of SL2(C). Finally, we will show that the developed tools can be used to compute Hilbert-Kunz functions of two-dimensional rings of type ADE with respect to other (monomial) ideals than the maximal. Moreover, Hilbert-Kunz functions of two-dimensional Fermat rings can be computed by the same method. There is also a paper, named "The Hilbert-Kunz functions of two-dimensional rings of type ADE", which gives a survey of main ideas and results. Moreover, the main theorem from Monskys paper "The Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity of an irreducible trinomial" will be generalized to a non-standard graded situation. This result will be used to study the behavior of the Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity in degenerations of the hypersurface rings defnied by those specific trinomials. Once more I want to thank my supervisor Holger Brenner for his guidance and friendship during the years.

Explore related subjects

math.ACmath.AGmath.RT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Brinkmann. 2016-04-28. Hilbert-Kunz functions of surface rings of type ADE. https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.08435

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On triviality of $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action

T. Kambayashi had shown that $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over separable field extensions are necessarily polynomial rings. However, there exist inseparable $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms which are not necessarily polynomial rings. In this paper, we give a structure theorem for $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over arbitrary field extensions admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action. From this structure theorem we derive some conditions under which an $\mathbb{A}^2$-form becomes trivial. In particular, we prove that over a field $k$, a factorial $\mathbb{A}^2$-form having a $k$-rational point and a non-trivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action is trivial and we also give examples demonstrating that none of these hypotheses can be discarded. As a consequence of the structure theorem, we obtain a generalization of the Zariski Cancellation Theorem for the affine plane over an arbitrary field.

math.AC↗
arXiv2026

Symbolic powers of the ideal of$n$ general points in $P^{n-1}$

Problem L of Fröberg--Lundqvist--Oneto--Shapiro asks for the difference between the Hilbert series of ordinary and symbolic powers of the ideal of general points in projective space. We solve this completely for \(n\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\). Besides a closed formula for \[ \HS(S/I^m)-\HS(S/I^{(m)}), \] we determine all minimal monomial generators of \(I^{(m)}\), and describe the symbolic Rees algebra. We also show that containment \(I^{(m)}\subseteq I^r\) is detected solely by initial degrees. This gives the exact containment threshold, the Waldschmidt constant \(\walpha\), the resurgence \(\Res\), and the asymptotic resurgence \(\aRes\): \[ \walpha(I)=\frac{n}{n-1}, \qquad \Res(I)=\aRes(I)=\frac{2(n-1)}{n}. \] We also take the first step beyond \(n\) points: for \(n+1\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\) --- again a rigid, non-monomial configuration --- we identify the defining quadrics, resolve the case \(n=3\) completely (a complete intersection, with \(J^{(m)}=J^m\) for all \(m\) and resurgence \(1\)), and propose an exact Waldschmidt-constant formula \(\walpha=\frac{n+1}{n-1}\) for all \(n\), verified computationally in every case we could check.

math.AC↗