Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1605.09153

New tools in GeoGebra offering novel opportunities to teach loci and envelopes

Abstract

GeoGebra is an open source mathematics education software tool being used in thousands of schools worldwide. Since version 4.2 (December 2012) it supports symbolic computation of locus equations as a result of joint effort of mathematicians and programmers helping the GeoGebra developer team. The joint work, based on former researches, started in 2010 and continued until present days, now enables fast locus and envelope computations even in a web browser in full HTML5 mode. Thus, classroom demonstrations and deeper investigations of dynamic analytical geometry are ready to use on tablets or smartphones as well. In our paper we consider some typical secondary school topics where investigating loci is a natural way of defining mathematical objects. We discuss the technical possibilities in GeoGebra by using the new commands LocusEquation and Envelope, showing through different examples how these commands can enrich the learning of mathematics. The covered school topics include definition of a parabola and other conics in different situations like synthetic definitions or points and curves associated with a triangle. Despite the fact that in most secondary schools, no other than quadratic curves are discussed, simple generalization of some exercises, and also every day problems, will smoothly introduce higher order algebraic curves. Thus our paper mentions the cubic curve "strophoid" as locus of the orthocenter of a triangle when one of the vertices moves on a circle. Also quartic "cardioid" and sextic "nephroid" can be of every day interest when investigating mathematics in, say, a coffee cup. We also focus on GeoGebra specific tips and tricks when constructing a geometric figure to be available for getting the locus equation. Among others, simplification and synthetization (via the intercept theorem) are mentioned.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francisco Botana, Zoltán Kovács. 2016-05-30. New tools in GeoGebra offering novel opportunities to teach loci and envelopes. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.09153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A constant-factor approximation of the Gromov-Hausdorff distance in the plane

We give the first polynomial-time constant-factor approximation of the Gromov-Hausdorff distance d_GH between finite point sets in the Euclidean plane; in fixed Euclidean dimension such an approximation was previously known only on the line (Majhi, Vitter and Wenk, 2024). Global alignment cannot succeed: the classical dimension drop defeats alignment by isometries, a multiplicity gap defeats alignment by bijections, and a reflection barrier defeats sorting under any single global reflection pattern. The algorithm is therefore local. Guessing the images of one diameter pair pins every point's longitudinal coordinate to within O(d_GH). Heights are read in windows whose height spread is at most a fixed multiple of their length, where a chain argument makes every compatible match local in the plane. One reflection sign per window is then chosen by 2-SAT; at the right frame and guess, any solution yields a correspondence of distortion O(d_GH). For the bijective relative of d_GH, half the least additive distortion over bijections, the same scheme reduces the planar problem to a matching question that we leave open.

cs.CG

Witness Set in Weak Visibility Polygons is Polynomial-Time Solvable

In the classical Art Gallery Problem (AGP), guards are placed in a polygon so that together they see every point. The Witness Set Problem (WSP), introduced by Amit, Mitchell, and Packer, is a natural dual to the AGP. In this paper, we study the WSP in weak visibility polygons (WVPs), the simple polygons in which every point is seen from some point of one fixed edge. A witness set is a set of points whose visibility regions are pairwise disjoint, so that no single guard sees two of them. A maximum witness set, therefore, lower-bounds the guard number. Exact polynomial-time algorithms for the WSP are known only for monotone mountains, a proper subclass of WVPs. We give the first exact polynomial-time algorithms for the WSP in WVPs, in two settings. In the Discrete Witness Set Problem (DiscWSP), the witnesses come from a given set of $m$ points, and we find a maximum witness subset in $O(n + m \log(n+m))$ time on an $n$-vertex polygon. The algorithm rests on a structural fact: the visibility intersection graph of a WVP, in which two points are adjacent if their visibility regions intersect, is a trapezoid graph, that is, an intersection graph of trapezoids between two parallel lines. Moreover, the class of these graphs properly contains the interval graphs and the permutation graphs, which may be of independent interest in graph theory. We also prove an $Ω(n \log n)$ lower bound in the algebraic decision-tree model for instances with $m = Θ(n)$, so our algorithm for DiscWSP is optimum. In the Continuous Witness Set Problem (ContWSP), a witness may be any point of the polygon, and we give an exact algorithm running in $O(n \log n + ρ^{2}(n + ρ^{2}))$ time, where $ρ$ is the number of reflex vertices.

cs.CG

Bichromatic Line-Centers for Point Pairs

We study the \emph{bichromatic line-center problem} for $n$ pairs of points in the plane. A feasible solution assigns one point from each pair to the red set $R$ and the other to the blue set $B$. The goal is to minimize $\max\{w^\circ(R),\,w^\circ(B)\}$, where $w^\circ(X)$ denotes the minimum width of a strip enclosing $X$; the midlines of the corresponding optimal strips define the line-centers of $R$ and $B$. We consider several variants induced by orientational constraints on line-centers and provide efficient algorithms for each. For one line-center, which consists of computing a minimum-width strip that contains at least one point from each pair, we give an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm. For two line-centers, we obtain an $O(n)$-time algorithm when both are horizontal, and $Θ(n\log n)$-time algorithms when the two centers are parallel or when both orientations are prescribed. When exactly one orientation is prescribed, we give an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm. Finally, for the unrestricted case, we present an $O(n^3\log n)$-time algorithm.

cs.CG