Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1606.01652

Distribution of energetic oxygen and hydrogen in the near-Earth plasma sheet

E. A. Kronberg·E. E. Grigorenko·S. E. Haaland·P. W. Daly·D. C. Delcourt·H. Luo·L. M. Kistler·I. Dandouras
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The spatial distributions of different ion species are useful indicators for plasma sheet dynamics. In this statistical study based on 7 years of Cluster observations, we establish the spatial distributions of oxygen ions and protons at energies from 274 to 955 keV, depending on geomagnetic and solar wind (SW) conditions. Compared with protons, the distribution of energetic oxygen has stronger dawn-dusk asymmetry in response to changes in the geomagnetic activity. When the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) is directed southward, the oxygen ions show significant acceleration in the tail plasma sheet. Changes in the SW dynamic pressure ($\mathit{P}_{dyn}$) affect the oxygen and proton intensities in the same way. The energetic protons show significant intensity increases at the near-Earth duskside during disturbed geomagnetic conditions, enhanced SW $\mathit{P}_{dyn}$, and southward IMF, implying there location of effective inductive acceleration mechanisms and a strong duskward drift due to the increase of the magnetic field gradient in the near-Earth tail. Higher losses of energetic ions are observed in the dayside plasma sheet under disturbed geomagnetic conditions and enhanced SW $\mathit{P}_{dyn}$. These observations are in agreement with theoretical models.

Explore related subjects

physics.space-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E. A. Kronberg, E. E. Grigorenko, S. E. Haaland, P. W. Daly, D. C. Delcourt, H. Luo, L. M. Kistler, I. Dandouras. 2016-06-06. Distribution of energetic oxygen and hydrogen in the near-Earth plasma sheet. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014ja020882

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

First Observation of a Polar Coronal Hole-like Fast Solar Wind Stream in the Sub-Alfvénic Solar Corona: an Analysis of Turbulence Properties

Parker Solar Probe, near its 23rd perihelion in March 2025, sampled an extended interval of sub-Alfvénic solar wind likely originating from a large equatorial coronal hole. At heliocentric distances of approximately 10 solar radii, with speed mostly above 400 km/s, this interval is a first example of ``polar coronal hole-like (PCH-l) fast" solar wind observed in the sub-Alfvénic solar corona. We characterize the turbulence properties of this unique interval using Parker Solar Probe measurements. Despite being sampled well inside the nominal Alfvén surface, the turbulence appears to be already well developed while remaining strongly transverse and highly imbalanced, exhibiting a large cross helicity. These observations provide new constraints on the development and evolution of solar wind turbulence within the lower corona.

physics.space-ph↗
arXiv2026

The Localized 12-hour Wave Over Alaska: Leveraging Meridional Wind Measurements From the Sodium Lidar

The 12-h wave in meridional winds in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) during the solar minimum 2018-2019 Arctic winter is investigated using sodium lidar observations at Poker Flat Research Range (PFRR), Chatanika, Alaska (64N,147W). Nightly 12-h wave amplitudes increased significantly during December-January, with amplitudes exceeding 130 m/s above 97 km on several days. This was more than double the 12-h wave amplitudes observed outside this time period. Meteor radar winds over Chatanika also showed significant increase in meridional wind 12-h wave amplitudes at altitudes between 82 and 97 km during this time period with lower amplitudes than lidar measurements. The strong variation in 12-h wave amplitudes was not correlated with SME index, though the largest amplitudes coincided with the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in early January. Measurements were compared to a seasonal WACCM-X model run and four days of HIAMCM. For the four dates of available HIAMCM data, 12-h wave amplitudes over Chatanika were found to be similar between both HIAMCM and WACCM-X and the lidar below 97 km, with amplitudes measured by lidar exceeding the models at altitudes between 97-105 km. All measurements followed a similar seasonal trend with increasing amplitudes at the end of December/early January. Fits of SW2 from WACCM-X show the SW2 tidal amplitude following similar seasonal trends to 12-h wave measurements. These high-resolution lidar measurements indicate that localized 12-h wave amplitudes are larger than previously reported by studies using meteor radar measurements.

physics.space-ph↗
arXiv2026

Coordinate Systems and Transforms in Space Physics: Terms, Definitions, Implementations, and Recommendations for Reproducibility

In space physics, acronyms for coordinate systems (e.g., \texttt{GEI}, \texttt{GSM}) are commonly used; however, differences in their definitions and implementations can prevent reproducibility. In this work, we compare definitions in online resources, software packages, and frequently cited journal articles and show that implementation differences can lead to transformations between same-named coordinate systems and position values from different data providers to differ significantly. Based on these comparisons and results, and to enable reproducibility, we recommend that (a) a standard for acronyms and definitions for coordinate systems is developed, similar to equivalents in astronomy or earth sciences; (b) a standards body develops a citable database of reference data needed for these transforms. For software that computes coordinate transforms, we also recommend that their developers provide explicit comparisons of their implementations with the results of (b) and documentation on implementation choices. Additionally, we provide recommendations for scientists and metadata developers to ensure that sufficient information is provided to enable reproducibility. Finally, we document that spacecraft positions from data providers can differ both because of differences in how they implemented transforms and because of differences in the original source of the position data, and provide recommendations to improve the documentation of spacecraft positional datasets.

physics.space-ph↗