Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1606.03711

Etienne Bézout on Elimination Theory

Abstract

Bézout's name is attached to his famous theorem. Bézout's Theorem states that the degree of the eliminand of a system a $n$ algebraic equations in $n$ unknowns, when each of the equations is generic of its degree, is the product of the degrees of the equations. The eliminand is, in the terms of XIXth century algebra, an equation of smallest degree resulting from the elimination of $(n-1)$ unknowns. Bézout demonstrates his theorem in 1779 in a treatise entitled "Théorie générale des équations algébriques". In this text, he does not only demonstrate the theorem for $n>2$ for generic equations, but he also builds a classification of equations that allows a better bound on the degree of the eliminand when the equations are not generic. This part of his work is difficult: it appears incomplete and has been seldom studied. In this article, we shall give a brief history of his theorem, and give a complete justification of the difficult part of Bézout's treatise.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Erwan Penchèvre. 2016-08-15. Etienne Bézout on Elimination Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03711

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO