Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1606.05820

Proceedings Sixth International Workshop on Classical Logic and Computation

Ulrich Kohlenbach·Steffen van Bakel·Stefano Berardi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The workshop series intends to cover research that investigates the computational aspects of classical logic and mathematics. Its focus is on unwinding the computational content of logical principles and proof in mathematics based on these principles, aiming to bring together researchers from both fields and exchange ideas. Classical Logic and Computation (CL&C) 2016 was the sixth edition of this workshop series held as a satellite to FSCD 2016 on June 23, 2016 in Porto, Portugal. In this sixth edition we received 11 submissions of both short and full papers. Eight (8) of these were selected to present at the meeting in Porto, and five (5) full papers were initially accepted to appear at this EPTCS special volume of which one was subsequently withdrawn by its authors. An invited talk was given by Marc Bezem (U. of Bergen): Coherent Logic - an overview. Other topics covered by this years submissions included: computational content of proofs using nonstandard analysis, a structured grammar-based approach to the Herbrand content of proofs, semantics of the lambda-mu calculus, normalization of classical natural deduction proofs, proof mining of noneffective proofs in convex optimization and algebra by functional interpretations. I like to thank the members of the program committee for their excellent work: Steffen van Bakel (London), Stefano Berardi (Torino), Fernando Ferreira (Lisboa), Hugo de'Liguoro (Torino), Alexandre Miquel (Montevideo). Ulrich Kohlenbach (Darmstadt, PC Chair)

Explore related subjects

cs.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ulrich Kohlenbach, Steffen van Bakel, Stefano Berardi. 2016-06-19. Proceedings Sixth International Workshop on Classical Logic and Computation. https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Differential Equations as Fixpoints and Games

Games and fixpoints are unified by proving that first-order game logic GL and the first-order modal mu-calculus L_mu are proved to be equiexpressive and equivalent, thereby fully aligning their expressive and deductive power. That is, there is a semantics-preserving translation from GL to L_mu, and vice versa. And both translations are provability-preserving, while equivalence with there-and-back-again roundtrip translations are provable in both calculi. This is to be contrasted with the propositional case, where game logic is strictly less expressive than the modal mu-calculus (without adding sabotage games). The extensions with differential equations, differential game logic (dGL) and differential modal mu-calculus, are also proved equiexpressive and equivalent. Moreover, as the continuous dynamics are definable by fixpoints or via games, ODEs can be axiomatized completely and, as a consequence, infinitesimally robust properties of ODEs can be decided via proof search. Rational gameplay provably collapses the games into single-player games to yield a strong arithmetical completeness theorem for dGL with rational-time ODEs.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2026

Self-extensional logics of formal inconsistency: Decidability and limits for paraconsistency

RmbC is a self-extensional paraconsistent logic in the family of Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs). This system is obtained from mbC (the basic LFI) by adding the replacement property via two global inference rules. RmbC is characterized by a non-explosive negation $\neg$ and a consistency operator $\circ$, which recovers the principle of explosion in a controlled way. Together with its principal axiomatic extensions, RmbC admits a standard Lindenbaum-Tarski algebraization, with Boolean algebras with LFI operators (BALFIs) as its algebraic semantics. In this paper, we study how far this self-extensional paraconsistent behavior can be extended axiomatically, starting from RmbC. We classify pairs of very natural consistency axioms according to whether they preserve paraconsistency or force classical collapse; identify six minimal explosive combinations that collapse to a single algebraic core; and isolate a separate structural obstruction for the combination of excluded middle for $\neg$ with an involutive negation. We also investigate, for the first time, the decidability of this family of self-extensional LFIs. As a first result, we prove the finite model property for RmbC with respect to BALFI semantics via an algebraic filtration, which yields decidability, and transfer this result to several paraconsistent axiomatic extensions of RmbC. Finally, we establish a coNEXPTIME upper bound for the validity problem of RmbC and a coNP-hardness lower bound, and prove coNP-completeness for the principal extensions containing one of the six minimal explosive pairs.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2026

The Stochastic Target Discounted-Sum Problem

The target discounted-sum problem (TDS) asks, given a finite integer alphabet $Σ$, a rational discount factor $λ$, and a rational target $t$, whether some infinite sequence over $Σ$ has discounted sum exactly $t$. This problem remains open and underlies several open questions in automata theory, games, and Markov decision processes. We introduce and solve its stochastic counterpart, the stochastic target discounted-sum problem, which replaces existence by computation of the probability. We show that the probability that a random sequence generated by a finite Markov chain has discounted sum $t$ is rational and computable in pseudo-polynomial time. We further show how to decide, in polynomial time, whether the discounted-sum distribution of a Markov chain is atomless, and how to approximate to an arbitrary precision the probability that the discounted sum exceeds a rational threshold. Our techniques for the stochastic TDS problem allow us to make progress on TDS objectives in stochastic games, which are known to be as hard as the TDS problem. Restricting the maximizing player to finite-memory strategies, while allowing the minimizing player to use arbitrary strategies, we reduce the value problem and the synthesis problem to corresponding problems for safety objectives in stochastic games. This yields computable optimal values and deterministic optimal strategies with pseudo-polynomially bounded memory for stochastic games, and results in pseudo-polynomial-time algorithms for special cases of Markov decision processes and deterministic two-player games.

cs.LO↗