Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1607.07750

On the Propagation of a Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejection during March 15 -- 17, 2015

Abstract

The largest geomagnetic storm so far in the solar cycle 24 was produced by a fast coronal mass ejection (CME) originating on 2015 March 15. It was an initially west-oriented CME and expected to only cause a weak geomagnetic disturbance. Why did this CME finally cause such a large geomagnetic storm? We try to find some clues by investigating its propagation from the Sun to 1 AU. First, we reconstruct the CME's kinematic properties in the corona from the SOHO and SDO imaging data with the aid of the graduated cylindrical shell (GCS) model. It is suggested that the CME propagated to the west $\sim$$33^\circ$$\pm$$10^\circ$ away from the Sun-Earth line with a speed of about 817 km s$^{-1}$ before leaving the field of view of the SOHO/LASCO C3 camera. A magnetic cloud (MC) corresponding to this CME was measured in-situ by the Wind spacecraft two days later. By applying two MC reconstruction methods, we infer the configuration of the MC as well as some kinematic information, which implies that the CME possibly experienced an eastward deflection on its way to 1 AU. However, due to the lack of observations from the STEREO spacecraft, the CME's kinematic evolution in interplanetary space is not clear. In order to fill this gap, we utilize numerical MHD simulation, drag-based CME propagation model (DBM) and the model for CME deflection in interplanetary space (DIPS) to recover the propagation process, especially the trajectory, of the CME from $30 R_S$ to 1 AU. It is suggested that the trajectory of the CME was deflected toward the Earth by about $12^\circ$, consistent with the implication from the MC reconstruction at 1 AU. This eastward deflection probably contributed to the CME's unexpected geoeffectiveness by pushing the center of the initially west-oriented CME closer to the Earth.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuming Wang, Quanhao Zhang, Jiajia Liu, Chenglong Shen, Fang Shen, Zicai Yang, T. Zic, B. Vrsnak, D. F. Webb, Rui Liu, S. Wang, Jie Zhang, Qiang Hu, Bin Zhuang. 2016-07-26. On the Propagation of a Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejection during March 15 -- 17, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ja022924

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Microphysical Diversity in Two Very Closely Spaced Magnetic Switchbacks Observed by Parker Solar Probe

Parker Solar Probe observations near the Sun reveal frequent, sudden reversals of the magnetic field known as switchbacks (SBs). Despite their ubiquity, the internal plasma structure and associated heating within SBs remain poorly understood. We present a case study of two closely spaced SBs (referred in text as SB_1 and SB_2) observed on 24 January 2020 using high-cadence magnetic and plasma measurements. Magnetic fluctuations are decomposed into components parallel and perpendicular to the mean field, and their power spectra are analyzed to characterize the turbulent cascade. The Partial Variance of Increments (PVI) method is applied to identify intermittent current-sheet-like features. Both SB intervals exhibit clear Alfvenic behavior and enhanced radial flow; however, their microphysics differ: SB_1 shows a higher proton temperature, larger fluctuation amplitudes, and a denser population of current sheets compared to SB_2. The two events also differ in spectral index, with SB_1 exhibiting a steeper perpendicular slope than SB_2. The elevated intermittency, proton temperature, and transient $β> 1$ excursion in SB_1 suggest that localized dissipation at small-scale structures is a plausible driver of the observed heating. These findings demonstrate that SBs are not uniform kinematic deflections but dynamically evolving plasma structures whose internal turbulence may regulate local energy conversion and contribute to the spatially intermittent heating of the near-Sun solar wind.

physics.space-ph

In-situ measurements of space plasma: recent progress and future challenges

Space plasmas like the solar wind or the Earth's space environment offer unique opportunities to observe fundamental plasma processes and their impact in situ. With modern space instrumentation, we measure the velocity distribution function of the plasma particles as well as the electromagnetic fields at high resolution and with minimal perturbation of the observed plasma systems. Plasma measurements like this are often not possible in laboratory settings on Earth. This review article focuses on modern diagnostic methods for the in-situ detection of plasma particles in space. It presents the detection principle of top-hat electrostatic analysers and highlights recent examples of scientific discoveries based on data from the heliospheric space missions Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter. These examples demonstrate the capabilities of modern space plasma instrumentation. The article then discusses future directions in space plasma physics as well as the involved challenges in terms of the required plasma diagnostics. These new developments include, for example, upcoming and proposed space missions such as the operational space-weather mission Vigil, the multi-spacecraft mission HelioSwarm, the Mars mission M-MATISSE, and the electron-astrophysics mission Debye.

physics.space-ph

Alfvénicity and Proximity to Parallel-Mode Marginal Stability in the Slow Solar Wind

The proton temperature anisotropy in the solar wind is bounded by the thresholds of pressure-anisotropy-driven kinetic instabilities, and the distance at which the plasma settles from these thresholds is thought to be regulated by compressive fluctuations through the fluctuating anisotropy effect. We test whether the level of Alfvénicity is associated with this distance in the slow solar wind. Using five years of Wind/SWE bi-Maxwellian proton measurements (2004--2008), we separate slow-wind intervals into Alfvénic and non-Alfvénic populations on the basis of normalized cross helicity and residual energy. We compare their magnetic compressive fraction and normalized compressive amplitude, and measure their proximity to marginal stability in the plane of parallel proton beta and temperature anisotropy using the maximum growth rate over the scanned parallel wavenumbers, $γ_{\parallel,\max}$, from a Vlasov dispersion solver. At low matched parallel beta, the Alfvénic slow wind has lower normalized field-strength fluctuation amplitude and reaches the parallel-mode marginal-stability criterion more often than the non-Alfvénic slow wind. This association is consistent with a weaker fluctuating-anisotropy effect in the Alfvénic slow wind, but does not establish a causal relation.

physics.space-ph