Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1609.00293

Narrowest-Over-Threshold Detection of Multiple Change-points and Change-point-like Features

Rafal Baranowski·Yining Chen·Piotr Fryzlewicz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We propose a new, generic and flexible methodology for nonparametric function estimation, in which we first estimate the number and locations of any features that may be present in the function, and then estimate the function parametrically between each pair of neighbouring detected features. Examples of features handled by our methodology include change-points in the piecewise-constant signal model, kinks in the piecewise-linear signal model, and other similar irregularities, which we also refer to as generalised change-points. Our methodology works with only minor modifications across a range of generalised change-point scenarios, and we achieve such a high degree of generality by proposing and using a new multiple generalised change-point detection device, termed Narrowest-Over-Threshold (NOT). The key ingredient of NOT is its focus on the smallest local sections of the data on which the existence of a feature is suspected. Crucially, this adaptive localisation technique prevents NOT from considering subsamples containing two or more features, a key factor that ensures the general applicability of NOT. For selected scenarios, we show the consistency and near-optimality of NOT in detecting the number and locations of generalised change-points. Furthermore, we propose to select NOT's threshold (automatically) via the strengthened Schwarz Information Criterion (sSIC) and give theoretical justifications. The NOT estimators are easy to implement and rapid to compute: the entire threshold-indexed solution path can be computed in close-to-linear time. Importantly, the NOT approach is easy to extend by the user to tailor to their own needs. There is no single competitor, but we show that the performance of NOT matches or surpasses the state of the art in the scenarios tested. Our methodology is implemented in the R package \textbf{not}.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rafal Baranowski, Yining Chen, Piotr Fryzlewicz. 2016-09-01. Narrowest-Over-Threshold Detection of Multiple Change-points and Change-point-like Features. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12322

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗