Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1609.09548

Approximate Hierarchical Clustering via Sparsest Cut and Spreading Metrics

Abstract

Dasgupta recently introduced a cost function for the hierarchical clustering of a set of points given pairwise similarities between them. He showed that this function is NP-hard to optimize, but a top-down recursive partitioning heuristic based on an alpha_n-approximation algorithm for uniform sparsest cut gives an approximation of O(alpha_n log n) (the current best algorithm has alpha_n=O(sqrt{log n})). We show that the aforementioned sparsest cut heuristic in fact obtains an O(alpha_n)-approximation for hierarchical clustering. The algorithm also applies to a generalized cost function studied by Dasgupta. Moreover, we obtain a strong inapproximability result, showing that the hierarchical clustering objective is hard to approximate to within any constant factor assuming the Small-Set Expansion (SSE) Hypothesis. Finally, we discuss approximation algorithms based on convex relaxations. We present a spreading metric SDP relaxation for the problem and show that it has integrality gap at most O(sqrt{log n}). The advantage of the SDP relative to the sparsest cut heuristic is that it provides an explicit lower bound on the optimal solution and could potentially yield an even better approximation for hierarchical clustering. In fact our analysis of this SDP served as the inspiration for our improved analysis of the sparsest cut heuristic. We also show that a spreading metric LP relaxation gives an O(log n)-approximation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Moses Charikar, Vaggos Chatziafratis. 2016-09-29. Approximate Hierarchical Clustering via Sparsest Cut and Spreading Metrics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.09548

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS