Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1611.01706

Self-reducible with easy decision version counting problems admit additive error approximation. Connections to counting complexity, exponential time complexity, and circuit lower bounds

Abstract

We consider the class of counting problems,i.e. functions in $\#$P, which are self reducible, and have easy decision version, i.e. for every input it is easy to decide if the value of the function $f(x)$ is zero. For example, $\#$independent-sets of all sizes, is such a problem, and one of the hardest of this class, since it is equivalent to $\#$SAT under multiplicative approximation preserving reductions. Using these two powerful properties, self reducibility and easy decision, we prove that all problems/ functions $f$ in this class can be approximated in probabilistic polynomial time within an absolute exponential error $ε\cdot 2^{n'}, \forallε>0$, which for many of those problems (when $n'=n+$constant) implies additive approximation to the fraction $f(x)/2^n$. (Where $n'$ is the amount of non-determinism of some associated NPTM). Moreover we show that for all these problems we can have multiplicative error to the value $f(x)$, of any desired accuracy (i.e. a RAS), in time of order $2^{2n'/3}poly(n)$, which is strictly smaller than exhaustive search. We also show that $f(x)<g(x)$ can be decided deterministically in time $g(x)poly(n), \forall g$. Finally we show that the Circuit Acceptance Probability Problem, which is related to derandomization and circuit lower bounds, can be solved with high probability and in polynomial time, for the family of all circuits for which the problems of counting either satisfying or unsatisfying assignments belong to TotP (which is the Karp-closure of self reducible problems with easy decision version).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eleni Bakali. 2016-11-05. Self-reducible with easy decision version counting problems admit additive error approximation. Connections to counting complexity, exponential time complexity, and circuit lower bounds. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01706

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC