Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1612.07895

Presence of Turbulent and Ordered Local Structure within ICME shock-sheath and its Contribution in Forbush decrease

Abstract

The transient interplanetary disturbances evoke short time cosmic ray flux decrease which is known as Forbush decrease. The traditional model and understanding of Forbush decrease suggest that the substructure of interplanetary counterpart of coronal mass ejection (ICME) independently contributes in cosmic ray flux decrease. These substructures, shock-sheath and magnetic cloud (MC) manifest as classical two-step Forbush decrease. The recent work by Raghav et. al. (2016a) has shown multi-step decreases and recoveries within shock-sheath. However, this can not be explained by ideal shock-sheath barrier model. Further, they suggested that the local structures within the ICME's sub-structure (MC and shock sheath) could explain this deviation of FD profile from the classical FD. Therefore, present study attempts to investigate the cause of multi-step cosmic ray flux decrease and their respective recovery within shock-sheath in detail. 3D-hodogram method has been utilized to get more details of the local structures within the shock-sheath. A 3D-hodogram method unambiguously suggests the formation of small scale local structures within the ICME (shock-sheath and even in MC). Moreover, the method could differentiate the turbulent and ordered Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) regions within the substructures of ICME. The study explicitly suggests that the turbulent and ordered IMF regions within shock-sheath do influence cosmic-ray variations uniquely.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zubair Shaikh, Anil Raghav, Ankush Bhaskar. 2016-12-23. Presence of Turbulent and Ordered Local Structure within ICME shock-sheath and its Contribution in Forbush decrease. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357%2Faa729f

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

First Observation of a Polar Coronal Hole-like Fast Solar Wind Stream in the Sub-Alfvénic Solar Corona: an Analysis of Turbulence Properties

Parker Solar Probe, near its 23rd perihelion in March 2025, sampled an extended interval of sub-Alfvénic solar wind likely originating from a large equatorial coronal hole. At heliocentric distances of approximately 10 solar radii, with speed mostly above 400 km/s, this interval is a first example of ``polar coronal hole-like (PCH-l) fast" solar wind observed in the sub-Alfvénic solar corona. We characterize the turbulence properties of this unique interval using Parker Solar Probe measurements. Despite being sampled well inside the nominal Alfvén surface, the turbulence appears to be already well developed while remaining strongly transverse and highly imbalanced, exhibiting a large cross helicity. These observations provide new constraints on the development and evolution of solar wind turbulence within the lower corona.

physics.space-ph

The Localized 12-hour Wave Over Alaska: Leveraging Meridional Wind Measurements From the Sodium Lidar

The 12-h wave in meridional winds in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) during the solar minimum 2018-2019 Arctic winter is investigated using sodium lidar observations at Poker Flat Research Range (PFRR), Chatanika, Alaska (64N,147W). Nightly 12-h wave amplitudes increased significantly during December-January, with amplitudes exceeding 130 m/s above 97 km on several days. This was more than double the 12-h wave amplitudes observed outside this time period. Meteor radar winds over Chatanika also showed significant increase in meridional wind 12-h wave amplitudes at altitudes between 82 and 97 km during this time period with lower amplitudes than lidar measurements. The strong variation in 12-h wave amplitudes was not correlated with SME index, though the largest amplitudes coincided with the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in early January. Measurements were compared to a seasonal WACCM-X model run and four days of HIAMCM. For the four dates of available HIAMCM data, 12-h wave amplitudes over Chatanika were found to be similar between both HIAMCM and WACCM-X and the lidar below 97 km, with amplitudes measured by lidar exceeding the models at altitudes between 97-105 km. All measurements followed a similar seasonal trend with increasing amplitudes at the end of December/early January. Fits of SW2 from WACCM-X show the SW2 tidal amplitude following similar seasonal trends to 12-h wave measurements. These high-resolution lidar measurements indicate that localized 12-h wave amplitudes are larger than previously reported by studies using meteor radar measurements.

physics.space-ph

Coordinate Systems and Transforms in Space Physics: Terms, Definitions, Implementations, and Recommendations for Reproducibility

In space physics, acronyms for coordinate systems (e.g., \texttt{GEI}, \texttt{GSM}) are commonly used; however, differences in their definitions and implementations can prevent reproducibility. In this work, we compare definitions in online resources, software packages, and frequently cited journal articles and show that implementation differences can lead to transformations between same-named coordinate systems and position values from different data providers to differ significantly. Based on these comparisons and results, and to enable reproducibility, we recommend that (a) a standard for acronyms and definitions for coordinate systems is developed, similar to equivalents in astronomy or earth sciences; (b) a standards body develops a citable database of reference data needed for these transforms. For software that computes coordinate transforms, we also recommend that their developers provide explicit comparisons of their implementations with the results of (b) and documentation on implementation choices. Additionally, we provide recommendations for scientists and metadata developers to ensure that sufficient information is provided to enable reproducibility. Finally, we document that spacecraft positions from data providers can differ both because of differences in how they implemented transforms and because of differences in the original source of the position data, and provide recommendations to improve the documentation of spacecraft positional datasets.

physics.space-ph