Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1701.01097

Regression with Partially Observed Ranks on a Covariate: Distribution-Guided Scores for Ranks

Abstract

This work is motivated by a hand-collected data set from one of the largest Internet portals in Korea. This data set records the top 30 most frequently discussed stocks on its on-line message board. The frequencies are considered to measure the attention paid by investors to individual stocks. The empirical goal of the data analysis is to investigate the effect of this attention on trading behavior. For this purpose, we regress the (next day) returns and the (partially) observed ranks of frequencies. In the regression, the ranks are transformed into scores, for which purpose the identity or linear scores are commonly used. In this paper, we propose a new class of scores (a score function) that is based on the moments of order statistics of a pre-decided random variable. The new score function, denoted by D-rank, is shown to be asymptotically optimal to maximize the correlation between the response and score, when the pre-decided random variable and true covariate are in the same location-scale family. In addition, the least-squares estimator using the D-rank consistently estimates the true correlation between the response and the covariate, and asymptotically approaches the normal distribution. We additionally propose a procedure for diagnosing a given score function (equivalently, the pre-decided random variable Z) and selecting one that is better suited to the data. We numerically demonstrate the advantage of using a correctly specified score function over that of the identity scores (or other misspecified scores) in estimating the correlation coefficient. Finally, we apply our proposal to test the effects of investors' attention on their returns using the motivating data set.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuneung Kim, Johan Lim, Young-Geun Choi, Sujung Choi, Do Hwan Park. 2017-01-04. Regression with Partially Observed Ranks on a Covariate: Distribution-Guided Scores for Ranks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01097

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME