Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1701.08386

The relationship between $k$-forcing and $k$-power domination

Daniela Ferrero·Leslie Hogben·Franklin H. J. Kenter·Michael Young
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Zero forcing and power domination are iterative processes on graphs where an initial set of vertices are observed, and additional vertices become observed based on some rules. In both cases, the goal is to eventually observe the entire graph using the fewest number of initial vertices. Chang et al. introduced $k$-power domination in [Generalized power domination in graphs, {\it Discrete Applied Math.} 160 (2012) 1691-1698] as a generalization of power domination and standard graph domination. Independently, Amos et al. defined $k$-forcing in [Upper bounds on the $k$-forcing number of a graph, {\it Discrete Applied Math.} 181 (2015) 1-10] to generalize zero forcing. In this paper, we combine the study of $k$-forcing and $k$-power domination, providing a new approach to analyze both processes. We give a relationship between the $k$-forcing and the $k$-power domination numbers of a graph that bounds one in terms of the other. We also obtain results using the contraction of subgraphs that allow the parallel computation of $k$-forcing and $k$-power dominating sets.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniela Ferrero, Leslie Hogben, Franklin H. J. Kenter, Michael Young. 2017-03-01. The relationship between $k$-forcing and $k$-power domination. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08386

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO↗