Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1701.09060

Automatic Kolmogorov complexity, normality and finite state dimension revisited

Abstract

It is well known that normality can be described as incompressibility via finite automata. Still the statement and the proof of this result as given by Becher and Heiber (2013) in terms of "lossless finite-state compressors" do not follow the standard scheme of Kolmogorov complexity definition (an automaton is used for compression, not decompression). We modify this approach to make it more similar to the traditional Kolmogorov complexity theory (and simpler) by explicitly defining the notion of automatic Kolmogorov complexity and using its simple properties. Using this characterization and a sufficient condition for normality in terms of Kolmogorov complexity derived from it, we provide easy proofs for classical results about normal sequences (Champernown, Wall, Piatetski-Shapiro, Besicovitch, Copeland, Erdos et al.) Then we extend this approach to finite state dimension. We show that the block entropy definition of the finite state dimension remains the same if non-aligned blocks are used. Then we provide equivalent definitions in terms of automatic complexity, superadditive bounds for Kolmogorov complexity, calibrated superadditive functions and finite state a priori probability and use them to give simple proofs for known results about finite state dimension, and for Agafonov's result saying that normality is preserved by automatic selection rules as well as the results of Schnorr and Stimm that relate normality to finite state martingales. Some results of this paper were presented at the Fundamentals in Computing Theory conferences in 2017 and 2019. Preliminary version of this paper (that does not mention the finite state dimension) was published in arxiv in~2017 (see the previous version of this submission).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Kozachinskiy, Alexander Shen. 2020-08-24. Automatic Kolmogorov complexity, normality and finite state dimension revisited. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.09060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Fundamental Scaling Laws of Covert Communication in the Presence of Block Fading

Covert communication is the undetected transmission of sensitive information over a communication channel. In wireless communication systems, channel impairments such as signal fading present challenges in the effective implementation and analysis of covert communication systems. This paper generalizes early work in the covert communication field by considering asymptotic results for the number of bits that can be covertly transmitted in $n$ channel uses on a block fading channel. Critical to the investigation is characterizing the performance of optimal detectors at the adversary. Matching achievable and converse results are presented.

cs.IT

Sequence Reconstruction over the Deletion Channel

In this paper, we consider the Levenshtein's sequence reconstruction problem in the case where the transmitted codeword is chosen from $\{0,1\}^n$ and the channel can delete up to $t$ symbols from the transmitted codeword. We determine the minimum number of channel outputs (assuming that they are distinct) required to reconstruct a list of size $\ell-1$ of candidate sequences, one of which corresponds to the original transmitted sequence. More specifically, we determine the maximum possible size of the intersection of $\ell \geq 3$ deletion balls of radius $t$ centered at $x_1, x_2, \dots, x_{\ell}$, where $x_i \in \{0,1\}^n$ for all $i \in \{1,2,\dots,\ell\}$ and $x_i \neq x_j$ for $i \neq j$, with $ n \geq t+\ell-1$ and $t \geq 1$.

cs.IT

A generalization of the map $χ$

The mapping $ χ_n:\mathbb{F}_2^n \to \mathbb{F}_2^n$ defined by $y=χ_n(x)$ with $y_i = x_i + x_{i+1}x_{i+2} + x_{i+2}$, where the indices are computed modulo $n$, has been widely studied for its application in lightweight cryptography. In this paper, we generalize this mapping and completely characterize all these shift-invariant permutations of the form $y_i=x_{i+u}+x_{i+v}(x_{i+w}+a_i)$, where $0\le u, v, w<n$ and $a_i\in \mathbb{F}_2$, $1\le i\le n$.

cs.IT