Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1702.00162

Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution protocol with small number of random delays

Abstract

The differential-phase-shift (DPS) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol was proposed aiming at simple implementation, but it can tolerate only a small disturbance in a quantum channel. The round-robin DPS (RRDPS) protocol could be a good solution for this problem, which in fact can tolerate even up to $50\%$ of a bit error rate. Unfortunately, however, such a high tolerance can be achieved only when we compromise the simplicity, i.e., Bob's measurement must involve a large number of random delays ($|\mathcal{R}|$ denotes its number), and in a practical regime of $|\mathcal{R}|$ being small, the tolerance is low. In this paper, we propose a new DPS protocol to achieve a higher tolerance than the one in the original DPS protocol, in which the measurement setup is less demanding than the one of the RRDPS protocol for the high tolerance regime. We call the new protocol the small-number-random DPS (SNRDPS) protocol, and in this protocol, we add only a small amount of randomness to the original DPS protocol, i.e., $2\leq|\mathcal{R}|\leq10$. In fact, we found that the performance of the SNRDPS protocol is significantly enhanced over the original DPS protocol only by employing a few additional delays such as $|\mathcal{R}|=2$. Also, we found that the key generation rate of the SNRDPS protocol outperforms the RRDPS protocol without monitoring the bit error rate when it is less than $5\%$ and $|\mathcal{R}|\leq10$. Our protocol is an intermediate protocol between the original DPS protocol and the RRDPS protocol, and it increases the variety of the DPS-type protocols with quantified security.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuki Hatakeyama, Akihiro Mizutani, Go Kato, Nobuyuki Imoto, Kiyoshi Tamaki. 2017-02-01. Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution protocol with small number of random delays. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.95.042301

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Lie-Algebraic Bounds on Quantum Control Time via the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff Formula

The time required to implement a desired unitary operation is a central issue in quantum control, especially for many-body systems with limited control access. While controllability theory determines whether a target unitary is reachable in principle, it does not directly quantify the implementation time. Here we derive a Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff (BCH)-based inequality that connects these two questions at the operator level. Whenever a target unitary is implemented by the available Hamiltonians, an effective logarithmic generator can be chosen within the corresponding dynamical Lie algebra, and its normalized traceless Hilbert-Schmidt norm is bounded by the time integral of the same norm of the applied Hamiltonian. This induces a global-phase-insensitive distance on the reachable subgroup and yields a protocol-independent lower bound on the control time that explicitly respects Lie-algebraic restrictions. We compare the resulting bound with familiar quantum-speed-limit estimates and show that it refines a stabilizer-based control-time bound for an XY spin chain in the single-excitation subspace. Our result thus provides an algebraic link between controllability and quantitative bounds on unitary implementation time.

quant-ph

Strict hierarchy between $n$-wise measurement simulability, compatibility structures, and multi-copy compatibility

The incompatibility of quantum measurements, i.e. the fact that certain observable quantities cannot be measured jointly is widely regarded as a distinctive quantum feature with important implications for the foundations and the applications of quantum information theory. While the standard incompatibility of multiple measurements has been the focus of attention since the inception of quantum theory, its generalizations, such as measurement simulability, $n$-wise incompatibility, and mulit-copy incompatibility have only been proposed recently. Here, we point out that all these generalizations are differing notions of the question of how many measurements are genuinely contained in a measurement device. We then show, that all notions do differ not only in their operational meaning but also mathematically in the set of measurement assemblages they describe. We then fully resolve the relations between these different generalizations, by showing a strict hierarchy between these notions. Hence, we provide a general framework for generalized measurement incompatibility. Finally, we consider the implications our results have for recent works using these different notions.

quant-ph

SPARSE: Scattering Poles and Amplitudes from Radial Schrödinger Equations

We introduce an algorithm for the solution of a system of radial Schrödinger equations describing the inelastic scattering of particles with spin in a partial wave with definite total angular momentum. The system of differential equations is approximated as an ordinary linear nonhomogeneous system using the finite difference method. Dirichlet boundary conditions are imposed at the origin and at an arbitrary large radius. The numerical wavefunction is calculated using LAPACK general banded LU decomposition routines. The $K$-matrix for physical energies is calculated from the numerical solutions of the system by least-square fit to the analytical real solutions at large distances. The scattering amplitudes for physical energies is then calculated from the $K$-matrix. Scattering poles in the lower half of the unphysical Riemann sheet are calculated by numerical extrapolation of the scattering amplitudes using the AAA algorithm for rational approximation.

quant-ph