Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1702.02547

Oblivious resampling oracles and parallel algorithms for the Lopsided Lovasz Local Lemma

Abstract

The Lov\'{a}sz Local Lemma (LLL) is a probabilistic tool which shows that, if a collection of "bad" events $\mathcal B$ in a probability space are not too likely and not too interdependent, then there is a positive probability that no bad-events in $\mathcal B$ occur. Moser & Tardos (2010) gave sequential and parallel algorithms which transformed most applications of the variable-assignment LLL into efficient algorithms. A framework of Harvey & Vondr\'{a}k (2015) based on "resampling oracles" extended this to general sequential algorithms for other probability spaces satisfying the Lopsided Lov\'{a}sz Local Lemma (LLLL). We describe a new structural property which holds for all known resampling oracles, which we call "obliviousness." Essentially, it means that the interaction between two bad-events $B, B'$ depends only on the randomness used to resample $B$, and not the precise state within $B$ itself. This property has two major consequences. First, combined with a framework of Kolmogorov (2016), it is the key to achieving a unified parallel LLLL algorithm, which is faster than previous, problem-specific algorithms of Harris (2016) for the variable-assignment LLLL algorithm and of Harris \& Srinivasan (2014) for permutations. This gives the first RNC algorithms for rainbow perfect matchings and rainbow hamiltonian cycles of $K_n$. Second, this property allows us to build LLLL probability spaces out of relatively simple "atomic" events. This provides the first sequential resampling oracle for rainbow perfect matchings on the complete $s$-uniform hypergraph $K_n^{(s)}$, and the first commutative resampling oracle for hamiltonian cycles of $K_n$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

David G. Harris. 2017-02-08. Oblivious resampling oracles and parallel algorithms for the Lopsided Lovasz Local Lemma. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02547

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS