Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1702.08545

Synergistic Computation of Planar Maxima and Convex Hull

Jérémy Barbay·Carlos Ochoa
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Refinements of the worst case complexity over instances of fixed input size consider the input order or the input structure, but rarely both at the same time. Barbay et al. [2016] described ``synergistic'' solutions on multisets, which take advantage of the input order and the input structure, such as to asymptotically outperform any comparable solution which takes advantage only of one of those features. We consider the extension of their results to the computation of the \textsc{Maxima Set} and the \textsc{Convex Hull} of a set of planar points. After revisiting and improving previous approaches taking advantage only of the input order or of the input structure, we describe synergistic solutions taking optimally advantage of various notions of the input order and input structure in the plane. As intermediate results, we describe and analyze the first adaptive algorithms for \textsc{Merging Maxima} and \textsc{Merging Convex Hulls}.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jérémy Barbay, Carlos Ochoa. 2017-02-27. Synergistic Computation of Planar Maxima and Convex Hull. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08545

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗