Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1703.03444

Anticipated synchronization in neuronal circuits unveiled by a phase-resetting curve analysis

Fernanda S. Matias·Pedro V. Carelli·Claudio R. Mirasso·Mauro Copelli
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Anticipated synchronization (AS) is a counter intuitive behavior that has been observed in several systems. When AS establishes in a sender-receiver configuration, the latter can predict the future dynamics of the former for certain parameter values. In particular, in neuroscience AS was proposed to explain the apparent discrepancy between information flow and time lag in the cortical activity recorded in monkeys. Despite its success, a clear understanding on the mechanisms yielding AS in neuronal circuits is still missing. Here we use the well-known phase-resetting-curve (PRC) approach to study the prototypical sender-receiver-interneuron neuronal motif. Our aim is to better understand how the transitions between delayed to anticipated synchronization and anticipated synchronization to phase-drift regimes occur. We construct a map based on the PRC method to predict the phase-locking regimes and their stability. We find that a PRC function of two variables, accounting simultaneously for the inputs from sender and interneuron into the receiver, is essential to reproduce the numerical results obtained using a Hodgkin-Huxley model for the neurons. On the contrary, the typical approximation that considers a sum of two independent single-variable PRCs fails for intermediate to high values of the inhibitory connectivity between interneuron. In particular, it looses the delayed-synchronization to anticipated-synchronization transition.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NCphysics.bio-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fernanda S. Matias, Pedro V. Carelli, Claudio R. Mirasso, Mauro Copelli. 2017-03-09. Anticipated synchronization in neuronal circuits unveiled by a phase-resetting curve analysis. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.95.052410

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identifying Neural State Changes due to Gain versus Off-Manifold Displacement

Memory segmentation is thought to arise from rapid decorrelation in neural activity, often quantified by Euclidean distance or cosine angle. Although these metrics detect a transition, they do not reveal how the new state relates to the repertoire represented by the neural manifold. This matters because neuromodulators that drive state transitions also alter excitability, and learning may repurpose existing representations or create new ones. Here, I introduce a geometric decomposition that separates changes attributable to gain modulation of a nearby manifold state from movement within the manifold and genuine off-manifold displacement. The approach uses the radial axis of neural population activity to partition the normal space of a local manifold region. A central challenge is identifiability: given only a static reference manifold and a single test state, neither the state from which a perturbation began nor its gain magnitude and mechanistic decomposition can generally be recovered uniquely. I therefore formulate identifiability as a cascade of geometric gates specifying when each component can be interpreted. The gates distinguish structural failures, including the absence of a local chart or incorrect intrinsic dimensionality, from estimation error and systematic bias caused by reference sampling, tangent-frame error, gain-axis misalignment, anchor displacement, and poor ratio conditioning. Simulations show that neighborhood size, curvature, sampling density, ambient dimension, and noise act through a small set of geometric quantities. The framework specifies when assignments to gain or novelty are identifiable, how they become biased, and which diagnostics reveal the relevant failure regime. By quantifying the nature rather than only the magnitude of neural state change, it provides a clear, readily interpretable framework for evaluating mechanisms of neural state transitions.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

Neural Langevin Machine: a local asymmetric learning rule can be creative

Fixed points of recurrent neural networks can be leveraged to store and generate information. These fixed points are captured by the Boltzmann-Gibbs measure, which leads to neural Langevin dynamics that relax to those fixed points for generative learning of a real dataset. We call this type of generative model a neural Langevin machine, which derives an asymmetric and firing-rate-speed-adjusted learning rule requiring only local neural signals, thereby bearing biological relevance in terms of local predictive learning. An out-of-equilibrium regime of the generative process is revealed, together with a memorization-to-generalization transition with increasing training data size. The neuro-inspired machine can also realize a continuous exploration of the phase space for different kinds of generative images and can denoise a corrupted image as well.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2026

A Mathematical Model of Motivated Emotional Mind - Cognitive Embodied System

This article presents a mathematical model of the Motivated Emotional Mind cognitive architecture developed for embodied intelligent systems. Such a system learns to maintain its homeostasis through a generalized form of reinforcement learning based on its internal motivations, termed motivated learning (ML). The principal contribution of this article is a rigorous formalization of the re-entrant loop integrating feedforward processing, lateral interactions, and feedback pathways, together with the representational selection mechanisms that govern adaptive system responses. The model specifies how ongoing exteroceptive and interoceptive signals, bodily-motivational context, and memory traces are bound into associative memory structures termed semblions, which compete for access to further processing and top-down reconstruction. The formalization encompasses secondary perception, representational competition, curiosity, procedural gaps, and action selection directed toward limiting allostatic violations. Within this framework, motivated learning is tailored to embodied systems whose dynamics are shaped by needs, affect, and the current regulatory state. Unlike standard reinforcement-learning models, the proposed approach incorporates need thresholds, goal generation and shifting goals, bodily state, resource constraints, and action uncertainty, thereby providing a more adequate account of response selection under regulatory pressure. Global affect functions as a central control signal, modulating the learning rate, representational valence, and the balance between exploration and exploitation. The model presented here is a step toward a more rigorous formalization of cognitive phenomena and may provide a basis for further theoretical analysis, computer simulation, and implementation in artificial-intelligence systems inspired by biological processes.

q-bio.NC↗