Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1704.06707

A population genetic interpretation of GWAS findings for human quantitative traits

Abstract

GWAS in humans are revealing the genetic architecture of biomedical and anthropomorphic traits, i.e., the frequencies and effect sizes of variants that contribute to heritable variation in a trait. To interpret these findings, we need to understand how genetic architecture is shaped by basic population genetics processes-notably, by mutation, natural selection and genetic drift. Because many quantitative traits are subject to stabilizing selection and genetic variation that affects one trait often affects many others, we model the genetic architecture of a focal trait that arises under stabilizing selection in a multi-dimensional trait space. We solve the model for the phenotypic distribution and allelic dynamics at steady state and derive robust, closed form solutions for summary statistics of the genetic architecture. Our results provide a simple interpretation for missing heritability and why it varies among traits. They also predict that the distribution of variances contributed by loci identified in GWAS is well approximated by a simple functional form that depends on a single parameter: the expected contribution to genetic variance of a strongly selected site affecting the trait. We test this prediction against the results of GWAS for height and BMI and find that it fits the data well, allowing us to make inferences about the degree of pleiotropy and mutational target size for these traits. Our findings help to explain why the GWAS for height explains more of the heritable variance than similarly-sized GWAS for BMI, and to predict the increase in explained heritability with study sample size. Considering the demographic history of European populations, in which these GWAS were performed, we further find that most of the associations they identified likely involve mutations that arose during the out of Africa bottleneck at sites with selection coefficients around $s=10^{-3}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuval B. Simons, Kevin Bullaughey, Richard R. Hudson, Guy Sella. 2017-12-07. A population genetic interpretation of GWAS findings for human quantitative traits. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002985

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Evolution as fitness landscape navigation: concepts, measures, and emerging questions

Fitness landscapes are mappings between genotypes, phenotypes, and fitness that shape evolution. In recent years, empirical work and theoretical models have greatly advanced our understanding of how populations navigate rugged fitness landscapes. Here, we provide a timely review of the theoretical aspects of this field. Its rapidly growing literature employs a wide range of terms, which are sometimes used ambiguously or inconsistently. We therefore begin by defining the major concepts and the field's vocabulary, highlighting our own terminology choices wherever needed. We then review key results on the relationships between epistasis, ruggedness, accessibility, and navigability for genotype-fitness maps, highlighting several complex and sometimes counterintuitive connections that have emerged. Further, we review how the conserved structural properties of the underlying genotype-phenotype map, which can lead to the formation of large connected neutral networks of genotypes, influence dynamics on fitness landscapes. We then compare the two levels to study landscape navigation: the level of genotype-phenotype maps and the level of genotype-fitness maps. Our review leads us to propose a new measure of navigability, based on evolutionary outcomes, that is broadly applicable and overcomes limitations of existing measures. Finally, we highlight examples from the smaller body of work that relaxes the common assumption of fitness-monotonic paths on static landscapes, and discuss how this can fundamentally change the nature of fitness landscape navigation. Throughout the review, we identify directions for future work to fill existing gaps and to synthesize the disparate strands of research within the field.

q-bio.PE

Best Matches in Phylogenetic Networks

Best match graphs (BMGs) were introduced in mathematical phylogenetics to describe the concept of closest relatives for related genes (leaves of rooted tree) in different organisms (defining leaf colors). We generalize this concept here to leaf-colored rooted networks, where least common ancestors are in general neither unique nor comparable. We characterize BMGs of rooted networks as those vertex-colored digraphs that are properly colored and satisfy an easy-to-check condition that we call the sicor-in-hub property. BMGs can be recognized in linear time and an explaining network can be constructed in quadratic time. Analogous results are obtained for reciprocal best match graphs (RBMGs), where an edge $\{x,y\}$ corresponds to pairs of vertices with different color that are mutually closest relatives.

q-bio.PE

Exact Counts of Binary Phylogenetic Networks with Four Reticulations

Phylogenetic networks provide a flexible framework for representing reticulate evolutionary processes, such as hybridization, introgression, recombination, and horizontal gene transfer. However, their combinatorial complexity makes even basic enumeration problems difficult. Building on our previous work for networks with up to three reticulations, we derive an explicit closed-form formula for the number of unrestricted rooted binary phylogenetic networks with four reticulations on \(n\) labeled taxa. Our approach is based on tree-component graphs. We classify the 79 possible component graphs corresponding to networks with four reticulations into ten groups. We then enumerate the networks associated with each group by combining known counts of one-component networks, forests, and networks with fewer reticulations. Summing these contributions yields the desired formula. This result extends the exact enumeration of unrestricted binary phylogenetic networks to four reticulations and further demonstrates the effectiveness of component graphs for systematically organizing and counting increasingly complex network classes.

q-bio.PE