Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1706.00075

Local Conjugacy in $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p^2\mathbb{Z})$

Abstract

Subgroups $H_1$ and $H_2$ of a group $G$ are said to be locally conjugate if there is a bijection $f: H_1 \rightarrow H_2$ such that $h$ and $f(h)$ are conjugate in $G$ for every $h \in H_1$. This paper studies local conjugacy among subgroups of $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p^2\mathbb{Z})$, where $p$ is an odd prime, building on Sutherland's categorizations of subgroups of $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})$ and local conjugacy among them. There are two conditions that locally conjugate subgroups $H_1$ and $H_2$ of $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p^2\mathbb{Z})$ must satisfy: letting $φ: \text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p^2\mathbb{Z}) \rightarrow \text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})$ be the natural homomorphism, $H_1 \cap \ker φ$ and $H_2 \cap \ker φ$ must be locally conjugate in $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p^2\mathbb{Z})$ and $φ(H_1)$ and $φ(H_2)$ must be locally conjugate in $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})$. To identify $H_1$ and $H_2$ up to conjugation, we choose $φ(H_1)$ and $φ(H_2)$ to be similar to each other, then understand the possibilities for $H_1 \cap \ker φ$ and $H_2 \cap \ker φ$. This study fully categorizes local conjugacy in $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p^2\mathbb{Z})$ through such casework.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H. Kim. 2017-08-08. Local Conjugacy in $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/p^2\mathbb{Z})$. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.00075

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Hyperfiniteness of boundary actions via tree decompositions

We study conditions for a countable group acting on a connected locally finite hyperbolic graph to induce a hyperfinite orbit equivalence relation on the Gromov boundary of the graph in terms of tree-decompositions of the graph. We prove that for a connected locally finite hyperbolic graph $X$ equipped with an action of a countable group $G$, if $(T, β)$ is a $G$-invariant tree-decomposition of $X$ such that each bag induces a connected subgraph $X_t$ of $X$ for each $t \in V(T)$, each adhesion set is finite and such that there are only finitely many $G$-orbits of edges of $T$, then the orbit equivalence relation of $G$ acting on the Gromov boundary $\partial X$ is hyperfinite provided the orbit equivalence relation of $G$ acting on $\partial T$ is hyperfinite and the orbit equivalence relations of the bag stabilizers acting on $\partial X_t$ are all hyperfinite. We show that the converse also holds if $(T, β)$ satisfies the additional property that each adhesion set distinguishes at least two ends of $X$.

math.GR

Compatible additions on a six-element commutative semigroup: equational bases and subvariety lattices

Let $M$ be the six-element commutative semigroup occurring as the common multiplicative reduct of the semirings $SR_6$ and $TR_6$. The closing paragraph of Shao, Ren, and Gao~\cite{ShaoRenGao2026} asks for the finite-basis and subvariety questions for the four remaining compatible additions on $M$. We answer these questions for the four isomorphism types $R_{01},R_{02},R_{11},R_{12}$. First, we classify all compatible additions on $M$: there are nine labelled additions and six isomorphism types, parametrized by $R_{ij}$ with $0\leq i\leq j\leq 2$. For each of the four new types we give a graph-theoretic criterion for every identity, an explicit infinite basis, and a proof of nonfinite basability. The generated varieties $\V(R_{01})$ and $\V(R_{02})$ have eleven subvarieties each, while $\V(R_{11})$ has sixty-six. The lattice $\Sub(\V(R_{12}))$ is countably infinite. Every identity in this variety reduces to a subset of twenty-five fixed identities together with two monotone path families $γ_n$ and $\gammaD_n$. This yields a canonical signature $(H,p,q)$, complete normal forms, explicit meet and join operations, and a formula for all covers. There are 153 fixed nodes, 43 one-parameter families, and 9 two-parameter families; exactly eighteen subvarieties are finitely based, and the unique limit subvariety is $\V(SR_6)$. The strong nonfinite-basis status of the four finite semirings remains open.

math.GR