Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1706.00767

Capri: A Control System for Approximate Programs

Swarnendu Biswas·Yan Pei·Donald S. Fussell·Keshav Pingali
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Approximate computing trades off accuracy of results for resources such as energy or computing time. There is a large and rapidly growing literature on approximate computing that has focused mostly on showing the benefits of approximation. However, we know relatively little about how to control approximation in a disciplined way. This document briefly describes our published work of controlling approximation for non-streaming programs that have a set of "knobs" that can be dialed up or down to control the level of approximation of different components in the program. The proposed system, Capri, solves this control problem as a constrained optimization problem. Capri uses machine learning to learn cost and error models for the program, and uses these models to determine, for a desired level of approximation, knob settings that optimize metrics such as running time or energy usage. Experimental results with complex benchmarks from different problem domains demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. This report outlines improvements and extensions to the existing Capri system to address its limitations, including a complete rewrite of the software, and discusses directions for follow up work. The document also includes instructions and guidelines for using the new Capri infrastructure.

Explore related subjects

cs.PL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Swarnendu Biswas, Yan Pei, Donald S. Fussell, Keshav Pingali. 2017-06-02. Capri: A Control System for Approximate Programs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.00767

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Expressive power of one-shot control operators and coroutines

Control operators, such as exceptions and effect handlers, provide a means of representing computational effects in programs abstractly and modularly. While most theoretical studies have focused on multi-shot control operators, one-shot control operators---which restrict the use of captured continuations to at most once---are gaining attention for their balance between expressiveness and efficiency. This study aims to fill the gap. We present a mathematically rigorous comparison of the expressive power among one-shot control operators, including effect handlers, delimited continuations, and even asymmetric coroutines. Following previous studies on multi-shot control operators, we adopt Felleisen's macro-expressiveness as our measure of expressiveness. We verify the folklore that one-shot effect handlers and one-shot delimited-control operators can be macro-expressed by asymmetric coroutines, but not vice versa. We explain why a previous informal argument fails, and how to revise it to make a valid macro-translation.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

Equality saturation theory exploration à la carte

Rewrite rules are critical in equality saturation, an increasingly popular technique in optimizing compilers, synthesizers, and verifiers. Unfortunately, developing high-quality rulesets is difficult and error-prone. Recent work to automatically infer rewrite rules does not scale to large terms or grammars. Users struggle to guide inference and incrementally construct rulesets because existing rule inference tools are monolithic and opaque. As a result, most equality saturation users still manually develop and maintain rulesets. This paper proposes Enumo, a new domain-specific language for programmable theory exploration. Enumo provides a small set of core operators that enable users to strategically guide rule inference and incrementally build rulesets. Short Enumo programs easily replicate results from state-of-the-art tools like Ruler, but Enumo programs can also scale to infer deeper rules from larger grammars than prior approaches. Enumo's composable operators even facilitate developing new strategies for ruleset inference. We introduce a new fast-forwarding strategy which does not require evaluating terms in the target language, and thus supports domains that were out of scope for prior work. Enumo is also easy to extend: two new operators suffice to incorporate large language models into rule inference, where they complement guided search. We evaluate Enumo and fast-forwarding across a variety of domains. Compared to state-of-the-art techniques, Enumo can synthesize better rulesets over a diverse set of domains, in some cases matching the effects of manually developed rulesets in systems driven by equality saturation.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

Authorization Revocation for Long-Running AI Agents: Root-Scoped Quiescence under Delegation and Asynchronous Execution

Long-running AI agents outlive initiating processes through credentials, delegated tasks, queues, callbacks, reservations, and provider-side operations. Cancellation, process exit, and credential revocation neither close every pre-cut carrier nor distinguish independently authorized shared work. We define root-scoped authorization quiescence: for each manifested sink, a certificate accounts for every cut-relevant acceptance under the retired root-epoch atom that precedes its local fence and excludes protected acceptance under that atom after the fence, while permitting exact rebind to a current, independently sufficient support. The root-scoped quiescence protocol linearizes a root cut, fences old-root expansion and protected sinks, represents alternative and conjunctive authority as antichains of minimal sufficient root sets, and composes provider-frontier certificates into a cutset over registered old-root paths. Exact channel-token accounting reconciles transfers; missing or conflicting evidence remains indeterminate. Under stated assumptions, we prove post-cut issuer non-expansion, support-sound projection, compositional soundness under exact channel conservation, independent-support preservation, merge-order independence, and crash/replay stability. A provider-free late-effect test suite matches 17/17 registered outcomes. Two cancellation-only and one cut-only execution accept the same class of already scheduled late effect; two cut-plus-fence executions, one restart, and one stale-process execution reject it. A separately implemented checker verifies 17/17 traces and rejects 44/44 consistently rehashed semantic regressions. The certificate establishes root-relative authorization quiescence within its bound manifest and configuration, not global idleness, rollback, or business completion.

cs.PL↗