Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1707.05432

A new proof of Dirichlet's theorem concerning prime numbers in arithmetic progressions

Abstract

It is known that there are infinitely-many prime numbers which take the form of a polynomial of degree one with integer coefficients, this is Dirichlet's theorem. We use an elementary sieving argument together with bounds on the prime number counting function to provide a new proof of Dirichlet's theorem. We show that if $a\in \mathbb{N},k\in \mathbb{N},a_{k}=(a,a+1,...,a+k-1) $ and $A=\left\{ p_{1},p_{2},...,p_{n}\right\} $, a finite set of primes. Then the number of components of $a_{k}$ that are divisible by some prime in $A$ is less than or equal to $$ \sum\limits_{\substack{ d|P(A)\\ d>1}}(-1)^{ω\left( d\right) +1}\left\lfloor \frac{k}{d}\right\rfloor +2n $$ where $ω\left( d\right)$ is the number of distinct prime divisors of $d$ and $P(A)=\prod_{p\in A}p$. We claim that the $+2n$ in the bound can be replaced with $n$, the \texttt{best possible bound}. However, we did not demonstrate our claim in this paper since the $+2n$(bound) is enough for the new proof of Dirichlet's theorem. This result effectively means that given $[1,x], x\in\mathbb{R}$; if the primes in $A$ divide $h$ integers in $[1,x]$ then for every $g>0$, they will divide at most $h+2|A|$ integers in $[1+g,x+g].$

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Acquaah Peter. 2017-07-21. A new proof of Dirichlet's theorem concerning prime numbers in arithmetic progressions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.05432

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT