Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1708.04393

Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis

Aaron Towne·Oliver T. Schmidt·Tim Colonius
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the frequency domain form of proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) called spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD). Spectral POD is derived from a space-time POD problem for statistically stationary flows and leads to modes that each oscillate at a single frequency. This form of POD goes back to the original work of Lumley (Stochastic tools in turbulence, Academic Press, 1970), but has been overshadowed by a space-only form of POD since the 1990s. We clarify the relationship between these two forms of POD and show that SPOD modes represent structures that evolve coherently in space and time while space-only POD modes in general do not. We also establish a relationship between SPOD and dynamic mode decomposition (DMD); we show that SPOD modes are in fact optimally averaged DMD modes obtained from an ensemble DMD problem for stationary flows. Accordingly, SPOD modes represent structures that are dynamic in the same sense as DMD modes but also optimally account for the statistical variability of turbulent flows. Finally, we establish a connection between SPOD and resolvent analysis. The key observation is that the resolvent-mode expansion coefficients must be regarded as statistical quantities to ensure convergent approximations of the flow statistics. When the expansion coefficients are uncorrelated, we show that SPOD and resolvent modes are identical. Our theoretical results and the overall utility of SPOD are demonstrated using two example problems: the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation and a turbulent jet.

Explore related subjects

physics.flu-dyn

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aaron Towne, Oliver T. Schmidt, Tim Colonius. 2018-06-01. Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Tandem jets in crossflow: a one-parameter dilution law for the trajectory and the velocity decay

The front jet of a tandem pair in crossflow is not passive. This paper treats the mean-flow phenomenology and its scaling; the mechanism is left to the companion paper. In 40\ kHz time-resolved PIV measurements covering nine spacing--velocity-ratio conditions ($L=2d$, $3d$, $4d$; $r\approx3$, $5$, $7$) and a single-jet baseline, the front-jet $rd$-normalized trajectory lies below the single-jet reference in every condition (near-field segment up to 40\% shorter), while the shielded rear jet rises above the reference in eight of the nine and penetrates $1.4$--$2.0$ times deeper than the front jet. The mean pressure and reverse-flow statistics are inconsistent with the two classical explanations: the inter-jet region is pressurized rather than sub-atmospheric, the lateral pressure difference across the front jet is weakened rather than enhanced (within reconstruction uncertainty), and the reverse-flow region does not follow the ordering of the modification. In natural coordinates the centerline decay re-scales onto the single-jet law at the effective velocity ratio (seven of nine within 18\%), so bending and decay are two readouts of one dilution, which whole-trajectory matching condenses into the one-parameter law $r_{\mathrm{eff}}/r=r/(r+c)$, $c=3.31$, with the velocity ratio as the primary control and the spacing entering through the near-field capacity ($c_h=2.50$--$3.30$). The law has one fitted constant and needs only the single-jet reference family; leave-one-condition-out predictions reproduce each held-out condition within 15\%, so the procedure is portable to any tandem array in which the gap recirculation closes.

physics.flu-dyn↗
arXiv2026

On buoyancy in disperse two-phase flow and its impact on the well-posedness of two-fluid models

The Maxey--Riley--Gatignol equation for the flow around a sphere at low particle Reynolds number tells us that the fluid-particle interaction force decomposes into a contribution from the local flow disturbance caused by the particle's boundary---consisting of the drag, virtual-mass, and history forces, and their Faxén corrections---and another contribution from the stress of the background flow, termed generalized-buoyancy force. There is also a consensus that, for general disperse two-phase flow, the interfacial force density, coupling the average fluid phase and dispersed-phase momentum balances, decomposes in a like manner. However, there has been a long-standing controversy about the physical closure separating the generalized-buoyancy from the interfacial force density, especially whether or not pseudo-stresses, such as the Reynolds stress, should be attributed to the background flow. Furthermore, most existing propositions for this closure involve small-particle approximations. Here, we show that all existing buoyancy closures are inconsistent with particle-resolving numerical simulations and/or at least one of two simple thought experiments designed to determine the roles of pseudo-stresses and small-particle approximations. We then derive the unique consistent closure. It requires no approximation and implies that all stresses and pseudo-stresses in the average fluid phase momentum balance, except the Reynolds stress, fully contribute to the background flow responsible for buoyancy. Remarkably, it exhibits a low-pass filter property, attenuating buoyancy at short wavelengths, that prevents it from causing Hadamard instabilities, constituting a first-principles-based solution to the long-standing ill-posedness problem of two-fluid models. When employing the derived closure, even simplistic two-fluid models are linearly well-posed.

physics.flu-dyn↗
arXiv2026

Global non-equilibrium thermodynamics of stationary states applied to the Rayleigh-Bénard convection

Classical thermodynamics describes physical systems in thermodynamic equilibrium, characterized in particular by the absence of macroscopic motion. Global non-equilibrium thermodynamics extends this framework to include physical systems in stationary states (Hołyst et al., EPL 149, 30001 (2025)). Here, we demonstrate that this extended theory captures macroscopic motion in stationary states, thereby providing a unified framework for global thermodynamics and fluid mechanics. We apply the theory to stationary Rayleigh-Bénard convection and show how the second law of global non-equilibrium thermodynamics determines the direction of changes in fluid motion.

physics.flu-dyn↗