Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1708.07428

Ordered Level Planarity, Geodesic Planarity and Bi-Monotonicity

Boris Klemz·Günter Rote
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce and study the problem Ordered Level Planarity which asks for a planar drawing of a graph such that vertices are placed at prescribed positions in the plane and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. This can be interpreted as a variant of Level Planarity in which the vertices on each level appear in a prescribed total order. We establish a complexity dichotomy with respect to both the maximum degree and the level-width, that is, the maximum number of vertices that share a level. Our study of Ordered Level Planarity is motivated by connections to several other graph drawing problems. Geodesic Planarity asks for a planar drawing of a graph such that vertices are placed at prescribed positions in the plane and such that every edge is realized as a polygonal path composed of line segments with two adjacent directions from a given set $S$ of directions symmetric with respect to the origin. Our results on Ordered Level Planarity imply $NP$-hardness for any $S$ with $|S|\ge 4$ even if the given graph is a matching. Katz, Krug, Rutter and Wolff claimed that for matchings Manhattan Geodesic Planarity, the case where $S$ contains precisely the horizontal and vertical directions, can be solved in polynomial time [GD'09]. Our results imply that this is incorrect unless $P=NP$. Our reduction extends to settle the complexity of the Bi-Monotonicity problem, which was proposed by Fulek, Pelsmajer, Schaefer and Štefankovič. Ordered Level Planarity turns out to be a special case of T-Level Planarity, Clustered Level Planarity and Constrained Level Planarity. Thus, our results strengthen previous hardness results. In particular, our reduction to Clustered Level Planarity generates instances with only two non-trivial clusters. This answers a question posed by Angelini, Da Lozzo, Di Battista, Frati and Roselli.

Explore related subjects

cs.CGcs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Boris Klemz, Günter Rote. 2017-08-24. Ordered Level Planarity, Geodesic Planarity and Bi-Monotonicity. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359587

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Stretch Factor of Planar Delaunay Triangulations Is Less Than 1.65

Delaunay triangulations are a fundamental class of plane spanners, and determining their worst-case stretch factor has been a longstanding problem in computational geometry. We prove an upper bound of \(1.65\), improving the bound of \(1.998\) due to Xia (2011) and reducing the gap to the known lower bound of \(1.5932\) by a factor of more than seven. Our proof works with the chains of circumdisks introduced by Xia, along which a path between two sites is assembled disk by disk. Xia measures such a path against a quantity attached to the whole chain, and because that quantity is not additive, his induction has to be carried alongside a separate global estimate. Our main idea is to measure the path against the progress it makes along the segment joining the two sites. This quantity is additive, so the bound becomes a Bellman recursion that forgets all but one number about the disks already passed, and we show that the bound holds if and only if a potential on the current state satisfies three local inequalities. The smallest feasible potential is the value function of that recursion, so searching for a potential becomes the problem of fitting this value function from above. The geometry of the disks reduces the fit to a linear program over functions of one variable, in which a GPT-based multi-agent system that we developed found a feasible point, certified in exact arithmetic.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Fast Persistent Homology Computation for Functions on $\mathbb{R}$

0-dimensional persistent homology is known, from a computational point of view, as the easy case. Indeed, given a list of $n$ edges in non-decreasing order of filtration value, one only needs a union-find data structure to keep track of the connected components and we get the persistence diagram in time $O(nα(n))$. The running time is thus usually dominated by sorting the edges in $Θ(n\log(n))$. A little-known fact is that, in the particularly simple case of studying the sublevel sets of a piecewise-linear function on $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{S}^1$, persistence can actually be computed in linear time. This note presents a simple algorithm that achieves this complexity and an extension to image persistence. An implementation is available in Gudhi.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Numerical Simulation of Transdermal Insulin Delivery Using a Coated Microneedle in a 2D Skin Model

In this work, we present a computational model to investigate transdermal insulin delivery using coated microneedles. A detailed skin geometry incorporating a coated microneedles was developed to analyze insulin release through the different skin layers and to evaluate the influence of key transport parameters. The model represents the major skin layers: the stratum corneum, viable epidermis, and dermis. Unstructured grids were used to achieve a reliable resolution of the model. The simulations provide insights into the permeation of insulin from the coated microneedles and the transport and distribution across the different skin layers. Finally, the simulation results were compared with experimental data to evaluate the predictive capability of the model.

cs.CG↗