Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1709.06559

Holomorphy of Osborn loops

Abstract

Let $(L,\cdot)$ be any loop and let $A(L)$ be a group of automorphisms of $(L,\cdot)$ such that $α$ and $ϕ$ are elements of $A(L)$. It is shown that, for all $x,y,z\in L$, the $A(L)$-holomorph $(H,\circ)=H(L)$ of $(L,\cdot)$ is an Osborn loop if and only if $xα(yz\cdot xϕ^{-1})= xα(yx^λ\cdot x) \cdot zxϕ^{-1}$. Furthermore, it is shown that for all $x\in L$, $H(L)$ is an Osborn loop if and only if $(L,\cdot)$ is an Osborn loop, $(xα\cdot x^ρ)x=xα$, $x(x^λ\cdot xϕ^{-1})=xϕ^{-1}$ and every pair of automorphisms in $A(L)$ is nuclear (i.e. $xα\cdot x^ρ,x^λ\cdot xϕ\in N(L,\cdot )$). It is shown that if $H(L)$ is an Osborn loop, then $A(L,\cdot)= \mathcal{P}(L,\cdot)\capΛ(L,\cdot)\capΦ(L,\cdot)\capΨ(L,\cdot)$ and for any $α\in A(L)$, $α= L_{eπ}=R^{-1}_{e\varrho}$ for some $π\in Φ(L,\cdot)$ and some $\varrho\in Ψ(L,\cdot)$. Some commutative diagrams are deduced by considering isomorphisms among the various groups of regular bijections (whose intersection is $A(L)$) and the nucleus of $(L,\cdot)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abednego Orobosa Isere, John Olushola Adeniran, Temitope Gbolahan Jaiyeola. 2017-09-19. Holomorphy of Osborn loops. https://doi.org/10.1515/awutm-2015-0016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Hyperfiniteness of boundary actions via tree decompositions

We study conditions for a countable group acting on a connected locally finite hyperbolic graph to induce a hyperfinite orbit equivalence relation on the Gromov boundary of the graph in terms of tree-decompositions of the graph. We prove that for a connected locally finite hyperbolic graph $X$ equipped with an action of a countable group $G$, if $(T, β)$ is a $G$-invariant tree-decomposition of $X$ such that each bag induces a connected subgraph $X_t$ of $X$ for each $t \in V(T)$, each adhesion set is finite and such that there are only finitely many $G$-orbits of edges of $T$, then the orbit equivalence relation of $G$ acting on the Gromov boundary $\partial X$ is hyperfinite provided the orbit equivalence relation of $G$ acting on $\partial T$ is hyperfinite and the orbit equivalence relations of the bag stabilizers acting on $\partial X_t$ are all hyperfinite. We show that the converse also holds if $(T, β)$ satisfies the additional property that each adhesion set distinguishes at least two ends of $X$.

math.GR

Compatible additions on a six-element commutative semigroup: equational bases and subvariety lattices

Let $M$ be the six-element commutative semigroup occurring as the common multiplicative reduct of the semirings $SR_6$ and $TR_6$. The closing paragraph of Shao, Ren, and Gao~\cite{ShaoRenGao2026} asks for the finite-basis and subvariety questions for the four remaining compatible additions on $M$. We answer these questions for the four isomorphism types $R_{01},R_{02},R_{11},R_{12}$. First, we classify all compatible additions on $M$: there are nine labelled additions and six isomorphism types, parametrized by $R_{ij}$ with $0\leq i\leq j\leq 2$. For each of the four new types we give a graph-theoretic criterion for every identity, an explicit infinite basis, and a proof of nonfinite basability. The generated varieties $\V(R_{01})$ and $\V(R_{02})$ have eleven subvarieties each, while $\V(R_{11})$ has sixty-six. The lattice $\Sub(\V(R_{12}))$ is countably infinite. Every identity in this variety reduces to a subset of twenty-five fixed identities together with two monotone path families $γ_n$ and $\gammaD_n$. This yields a canonical signature $(H,p,q)$, complete normal forms, explicit meet and join operations, and a formula for all covers. There are 153 fixed nodes, 43 one-parameter families, and 9 two-parameter families; exactly eighteen subvarieties are finitely based, and the unique limit subvariety is $\V(SR_6)$. The strong nonfinite-basis status of the four finite semirings remains open.

math.GR