Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1709.09492

Reversible Sequences of Cardinals, Reversible Equivalence Relations, and Similar Structures

Abstract

A relational structure ${\mathbb X}$ is said to be reversible iff every bijective endomorphism $f:X\rightarrow X$ is an automorphism. We define a sequence of non-zero cardinals $\langle κ_i :i\in I\rangle$ to be reversible iff each surjection $f :I\rightarrow I$ such that $κ_j =\sum_{i\in f^{-1}[\{ j \}]}κ_i$, for all $j\in I $, is a bijection, and characterize such sequences: either $\langle κ_i :i\in I\rangle$ is a finite-to-one sequence, or $κ_i\in {\mathbb N}$, for all $i\in I$, $K:=\{ m\in {\mathbb N} : κ_i =m $, for infinitely many $i\in I \}$ is a non-empty independent set, and $\gcd (K)$ divides at most finitely many elements of the set $\{ κ_i :i\in I \}$. We isolate a class of binary structures such that a structure from the class is reversible iff the sequence of cardinalities of its connectivity components is reversible. In particular, we characterize reversible equivalence relations, reversible posets which are disjoint unions of cardinals $\leq ω$, and some similar structures. In addition, we show that a poset with linearly ordered connectivity components is reversible, if the corresponding sequence of cardinalities is reversible and, using this fact, detect a wide class of examples of reversible posets and topological spaces.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Miloš S. Kurilić, Nenad Morača. 2017-09-27. Reversible Sequences of Cardinals, Reversible Equivalence Relations, and Similar Structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.09492

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO