Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1710.01890

Sandwich semigroups in locally small categories I: Foundations

Abstract

Fix (not necessarily distinct) objects $i$ and $j$ of a locally small category $S$, and write $S_{ij}$ for the set of all morphisms $i\to j$. Fix a morphism $a\in S_{ji}$, and define an operation $\star_a$ on $S_{ij}$ by $x\star_ay=xay$ for all $x,y\in S_{ij}$. Then $(S_{ij},\star_a)$ is a semigroup, known as a sandwich semigroup, and denoted by $S_{ij}^a$. This article develops a general theory of sandwich semigroups in locally small categories. We begin with structural issues such as regularity, Green's relations and stability, focusing on the relationships between these properties on $S_{ij}^a$ and the whole category $S$. We then identify a natural condition on $a$, called sandwich regularity, under which the set Reg$(S_{ij}^a)$ of all regular elements of $S_{ij}^a$ is a subsemigroup of $S_{ij}^a$. Under this condition, we carefully analyse the structure of the semigroup Reg$(S_{ij}^a)$, relating it via pullback products to certain regular subsemigroups of $S_{ii}$ and $S_{jj}$, and to a certain regular sandwich monoid defined on a subset of $S_{ji}$; among other things, this allows us to also describe the idempotent-generated subsemigroup $\mathbb E(S_{ij}^a)$ of $S_{ij}^a$. We also study combinatorial invariants such as the rank (minimal size of a generating set) of the semigroups $S_{ij}^a$, Reg$(S_{ij}^a)$ and $\mathbb E(S_{ij}^a)$; we give lower bounds for these ranks, and in the case of Reg$(S_{ij}^a)$ and $\mathbb E(S_{ij}^a)$ show that the bounds are sharp under a certain condition we call MI-domination. Applications to concrete categories of transformations and partial transformations are given in Part II.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Igor Dolinka, Ivana Đurđev, James East, Preeyanuch Honyam, Kritsada Sangkhanan, Jintana Sanwong, Worachead Sommanee. 2018-01-10. Sandwich semigroups in locally small categories I: Foundations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.01890

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Hyperfiniteness of boundary actions via tree decompositions

We study conditions for a countable group acting on a connected locally finite hyperbolic graph to induce a hyperfinite orbit equivalence relation on the Gromov boundary of the graph in terms of tree-decompositions of the graph. We prove that for a connected locally finite hyperbolic graph $X$ equipped with an action of a countable group $G$, if $(T, β)$ is a $G$-invariant tree-decomposition of $X$ such that each bag induces a connected subgraph $X_t$ of $X$ for each $t \in V(T)$, each adhesion set is finite and such that there are only finitely many $G$-orbits of edges of $T$, then the orbit equivalence relation of $G$ acting on the Gromov boundary $\partial X$ is hyperfinite provided the orbit equivalence relation of $G$ acting on $\partial T$ is hyperfinite and the orbit equivalence relations of the bag stabilizers acting on $\partial X_t$ are all hyperfinite. We show that the converse also holds if $(T, β)$ satisfies the additional property that each adhesion set distinguishes at least two ends of $X$.

math.GR

Compatible additions on a six-element commutative semigroup: equational bases and subvariety lattices

Let $M$ be the six-element commutative semigroup occurring as the common multiplicative reduct of the semirings $SR_6$ and $TR_6$. The closing paragraph of Shao, Ren, and Gao~\cite{ShaoRenGao2026} asks for the finite-basis and subvariety questions for the four remaining compatible additions on $M$. We answer these questions for the four isomorphism types $R_{01},R_{02},R_{11},R_{12}$. First, we classify all compatible additions on $M$: there are nine labelled additions and six isomorphism types, parametrized by $R_{ij}$ with $0\leq i\leq j\leq 2$. For each of the four new types we give a graph-theoretic criterion for every identity, an explicit infinite basis, and a proof of nonfinite basability. The generated varieties $\V(R_{01})$ and $\V(R_{02})$ have eleven subvarieties each, while $\V(R_{11})$ has sixty-six. The lattice $\Sub(\V(R_{12}))$ is countably infinite. Every identity in this variety reduces to a subset of twenty-five fixed identities together with two monotone path families $γ_n$ and $\gammaD_n$. This yields a canonical signature $(H,p,q)$, complete normal forms, explicit meet and join operations, and a formula for all covers. There are 153 fixed nodes, 43 one-parameter families, and 9 two-parameter families; exactly eighteen subvarieties are finitely based, and the unique limit subvariety is $\V(SR_6)$. The strong nonfinite-basis status of the four finite semirings remains open.

math.GR