Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1710.06018

Compressible Flow at High Pressure with Linear Equation of State

William A. Sirignano
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Compressible flow varies from ideal-gas behavior at high pressures where molecular interactions become important. Density is described through a cubic equation of state while enthalpy and sound speed are functions of both temperature and pressure, based on two parameters, A and B, related to intermolecular attraction and repulsion, respectively. Assuming small variations from ideal-gas behavior, a closed-form solution is obtained that is valid over a wide range of conditions. An expansion in these molecular-interaction parameters simplifies relations for flow variables, elucidating the role of molecular repulsion and attraction in variations from ideal-gas behavior. Real-gas modifications in density, enthalpy, and sound speed for a given pressure and temperature lead to variations in many basic compressible flow configurations. Sometimes, the variations can be substantial in quantitative or qualitative terms. The new approach is applied to choked-nozzle flow, isentropic flow, nonlinear-wave propagation, and flow across a shock wave, all for the real gas. Modifications are obtained for allowable mass-flow through a choked nozzle, nozzle thrust, sonic wave speed, Riemann invariants, Prandtl's shock relation, and the Rankine-Hugoniot relations. Forced acoustic oscillations can show substantial augmentation of pressure amplitudes when real-gas effects are taken into account. Shocks at higher temperatures and pressures can have larger pressure jumps with real-gas effects. Weak shocks decay to zero strength at sonic speed. The proposed framework can rely on any cubic equation of state and be applied to multicomponent flows or to more-complex flow configurations.

Explore related subjects

physics.flu-dyn

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

William A. Sirignano. 2017-10-16. Compressible Flow at High Pressure with Linear Equation of State. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.166

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Tandem jets in crossflow: a one-parameter dilution law for the trajectory and the velocity decay

The front jet of a tandem pair in crossflow is not passive. This paper treats the mean-flow phenomenology and its scaling; the mechanism is left to the companion paper. In 40\ kHz time-resolved PIV measurements covering nine spacing--velocity-ratio conditions ($L=2d$, $3d$, $4d$; $r\approx3$, $5$, $7$) and a single-jet baseline, the front-jet $rd$-normalized trajectory lies below the single-jet reference in every condition (near-field segment up to 40\% shorter), while the shielded rear jet rises above the reference in eight of the nine and penetrates $1.4$--$2.0$ times deeper than the front jet. The mean pressure and reverse-flow statistics are inconsistent with the two classical explanations: the inter-jet region is pressurized rather than sub-atmospheric, the lateral pressure difference across the front jet is weakened rather than enhanced (within reconstruction uncertainty), and the reverse-flow region does not follow the ordering of the modification. In natural coordinates the centerline decay re-scales onto the single-jet law at the effective velocity ratio (seven of nine within 18\%), so bending and decay are two readouts of one dilution, which whole-trajectory matching condenses into the one-parameter law $r_{\mathrm{eff}}/r=r/(r+c)$, $c=3.31$, with the velocity ratio as the primary control and the spacing entering through the near-field capacity ($c_h=2.50$--$3.30$). The law has one fitted constant and needs only the single-jet reference family; leave-one-condition-out predictions reproduce each held-out condition within 15\%, so the procedure is portable to any tandem array in which the gap recirculation closes.

physics.flu-dyn↗
arXiv2026

On buoyancy in disperse two-phase flow and its impact on the well-posedness of two-fluid models

The Maxey--Riley--Gatignol equation for the flow around a sphere at low particle Reynolds number tells us that the fluid-particle interaction force decomposes into a contribution from the local flow disturbance caused by the particle's boundary---consisting of the drag, virtual-mass, and history forces, and their Faxén corrections---and another contribution from the stress of the background flow, termed generalized-buoyancy force. There is also a consensus that, for general disperse two-phase flow, the interfacial force density, coupling the average fluid phase and dispersed-phase momentum balances, decomposes in a like manner. However, there has been a long-standing controversy about the physical closure separating the generalized-buoyancy from the interfacial force density, especially whether or not pseudo-stresses, such as the Reynolds stress, should be attributed to the background flow. Furthermore, most existing propositions for this closure involve small-particle approximations. Here, we show that all existing buoyancy closures are inconsistent with particle-resolving numerical simulations and/or at least one of two simple thought experiments designed to determine the roles of pseudo-stresses and small-particle approximations. We then derive the unique consistent closure. It requires no approximation and implies that all stresses and pseudo-stresses in the average fluid phase momentum balance, except the Reynolds stress, fully contribute to the background flow responsible for buoyancy. Remarkably, it exhibits a low-pass filter property, attenuating buoyancy at short wavelengths, that prevents it from causing Hadamard instabilities, constituting a first-principles-based solution to the long-standing ill-posedness problem of two-fluid models. When employing the derived closure, even simplistic two-fluid models are linearly well-posed.

physics.flu-dyn↗
arXiv2026

Global non-equilibrium thermodynamics of stationary states applied to the Rayleigh-Bénard convection

Classical thermodynamics describes physical systems in thermodynamic equilibrium, characterized in particular by the absence of macroscopic motion. Global non-equilibrium thermodynamics extends this framework to include physical systems in stationary states (Hołyst et al., EPL 149, 30001 (2025)). Here, we demonstrate that this extended theory captures macroscopic motion in stationary states, thereby providing a unified framework for global thermodynamics and fluid mechanics. We apply the theory to stationary Rayleigh-Bénard convection and show how the second law of global non-equilibrium thermodynamics determines the direction of changes in fluid motion.

physics.flu-dyn↗