arXiv · 1711.00841
Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methods
Abstract
We establish lower bounds on the complexity of finding $ε$-stationary points of smooth, non-convex high-dimensional functions using first-order methods. We prove that deterministic first-order methods, even applied to arbitrarily smooth functions, cannot achieve convergence rates in $ε$ better than $ε^{-8/5}$, which is within $ε^{-1/15}\log\frac{1}ε$ of the best known rate for such methods. Moreover, for functions with Lipschitz first and second derivatives, we prove no deterministic first-order method can achieve convergence rates better than $ε^{-12/7}$, while $ε^{-2}$ is a lower bound for functions with only Lipschitz gradient. For convex functions with Lipschitz gradient, accelerated gradient descent achieves the rate $ε^{-1}\log\frac{1}ε$, showing that finding stationary points is easier given convexity.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Yair Carmon, John C. Duchi, Oliver Hinder, Aaron Sidford. 2017-11-02. Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methods. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00841
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.