Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1801.00154

Victorinus Sch\"onfeldt (1533 - 1591) und sein "Prognosticon Astrologicum"

Abstract

Annual astrological calendars, practica and prognostications became widespread publications in Europe after the invention of printing presses in the 15th century. Using the national language instead of Latin, the language of the scientists, the motion of sun, moon and planets were explained and used to foretell weather, growth of fruit, diseases, war and misfortune. By this means astronomical knowledge became accessible to everyone capable of reading. A milestone in the context of position calculations of bodies of our solar system was the publication of the Copernican system in 1543. When Victorinus Sch\"onfeldt started his studies at Wittenberg University he was educated in the so called "Wittenberg Interpretation" of Copernicus. In 1557 Sch\"onfeldt became professor of mathematics at Marburg University and in 1566 he additionally was given a professorship of medicine With the help of his teachers and mentors in Wittenberg Sch\"onfeldt was introduced to the court of the landgrave of Hessen in Marburg and became a close friend to the noble family. To Wilhelm IV., landgrave of Hessen-Kassel from 1567, he served not only as one of the personal physicians but as a scientific counselor in the landgraves' astronomical studies. Presumably right after being appointed a professor of mathematics Sch\"onfeldt began to write his "\emph{Prognosticon Astrologicum}", a series of annual books, that he continued until his death. He made use the Copernican system for his calculations, comparing them occasionally with calculations using new Ptolemaic based ephemerides and in his last almanacs with calculations based on Tycho Brahes' model.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andreas Schrimpf. 2017-12-30. Victorinus Sch\"onfeldt (1533 - 1591) und sein "Prognosticon Astrologicum". https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00154

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Scientific Promise

Scientists constantly face decisions about what lines of research to pursue. This Element introduces the philosophical debate about scientific pursuitworthiness. It explains how it can be rational to pursue a theory even if the theory is less well supported than its rivals, and it discusses existing philosophical frameworks for guiding pursuit decisions. The Element also develops a new perspective. Existing accounts focus predominantly on theories, while experiments are largely neglected. This is an important shortcoming. Theoretical promise depends on experimental promise, and experimental promise raises questions of its own. Drawing on the epistemology of experimentation, the Element advances an account of experimental pursuitworthiness. It is argued that such pursuitworthiness depends on experimental virtues like a clear signal and simplicity of design. Moreover, the kinds of uncertainty that constrain the assessment of scientific pursuits are examined. Finally, the Element highlights open questions in the philosophy of scientific pursuitworthiness.

physics.hist-ph

Is Black Hole Evaporation Prediction Friendly?

Manchak and Weatherall (2018) formulate the black hole information paradox as a failure of predictability in black hole evaporation spacetimes, diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I offer a strategy for resolving this paradox. I argue that failures of predictability in black hole evaporation are not well diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I then consider two weakenings of global hyperbolicity: prediction and retrodiction friendliness, the failure of which could ground a new paradox. However, deidealized black hole evaporation models can be prediction and retrodiction friendly. Therefore, the information paradox cannot be based upon failures of global hyperbolicity, nor either retrodiction or prediction unfriendliness.

physics.hist-ph

The Crab Nebula progenitor: recovering the 1054 AD supernova event as galactic Gamma-ray burst

In 1054 AD a daytime star appeared in the constellation of Taurus, for three weeks, and it was reported in various sources from Europe to China/Japan: it was one of the few documented galactic supernovae of the last two millenia. This paradigm has been established about sixty years ago, as the comprehension of the physics of supernovae progressed with enough observational data. The Gamma-ray bursts were discovered in the same period, but only in the past few years have their observations become daily and their distances have been fully understood as cosmological. After the explosion, the exponential decay of the luminosity in gamma-rays and X-rays has been followed with telescopes onboard dedicated satellites. Also the exponential decay of the afterglow's optical and radio frequencies have been observed with the largest optical and radio telescopes. Within the binary-driven hypernova framework, successful in explaining all the observed phases of the Gamma-ray bursts, the universal exponential decay can be extended to 1000 years after the burst, to account for the present values of Gamma and X-rays as well as optical and radio frequencies of the Crab Nebula. Both the daytime visibility of the burst, and the simultaneous radiation plagues appeared in Constantinople and Cairo is a strong evidence of the presence of Gamma-rays in the lower atmosphere, coming from the same source originating the Crab nebula. The association to the daytime visibility of that star and the following plague meets exactly the etymology of the word dis-aster, bad star.

physics.hist-ph