Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1801.01813

On a numerical upper bound for the extended Goldbach conjecture

Abstract

The Goldbach conjecture states that every even number can be decomposed as the sum of two primes. Let $D(N)$ denote the number of such prime decompositions for an even $N$. It is known that $D(N)$ can be bounded above by $$ D(N) \leq C^* Θ(N), \quad Θ(N):= \frac{N}{\log^2 N}\prod_{\substack{p|N p>2}} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{p-2}\right)\prod_{p>2}\left(1-\frac{1}{(p-1)^2}\right) $$ where $C^*$ denotes Chen's constant. It is conjectured that $C^*=2$. In 2004, Wu showed that $C^* \leq 7.8209$. We attempted to replicate his work in computing Chen's constant, and in doing so we provide an improved approximation of the Buchstab function $ω(u)$, \begin{align*} ω(u)=1/u, & \quad (1\leq u\leq 2), (u ω(u))'=ω(u-1), & \quad (u\geq 2). \end{align*} based on work done by Cheer and Goldston. For each interval $[j,j+1]$, they expressed $ω(u)$ as a Taylor expansion about $u=j+1$. We expanded about the point $u=j+0.5$, so $ω(u)$ was never evaluated more than $0.5$ away from the center of the Taylor expansion, which gave much stronger error bounds. Issues arose while using this Taylor expansion to compute the required integrals for Chen's constant, so we proceeded with solving the above differential equation to obtain $ω(u)$, and then integrating the result. Although the values that were obtained undershot Wu's results, we pressed on and refined Wu's work by discretising his integrals with finer granularity. The improvements to Chen's constant were negligible (as predicted by Wu). This provides experimental evidence, but not a proof, that were Wu's integrals computed on smaller intervals in exact form, the improvement to Chen's constant would be negligible. Thus, any substantial improvement on Chen's constant likely requires a radically different method to what Wu provided.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David Quarel. 2017-12-29. On a numerical upper bound for the extended Goldbach conjecture. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01813

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO