Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1801.07584

The Case for Raabe's Test

Abstract

Among the techniques for determining the convergence of a series, Raabe's Test remains relatively unfamiliar to most mathematicians. We present several results relating to Raabe's Test that do not seem to be widely known, making the case that Raabe's Test should be featured more prominently in undergraduate calculus and analysis courses. In particular, we demonstrate that Raabe's Test may be viewed as an implicit comparison with a $p$-series, in the same manner that the Ratio Test and the Root Test constitute an implicit comparison with a geometric series. Moreover, Raabe's Test can sometimes simplify the process for determining conditional convergence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Christopher N. B. Hammond. 2018-01-20. The Case for Raabe's Test. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07584

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO