Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1802.07178

Primitive abundant and weird numbers with many prime factors

Abstract

We give an algorithm to enumerate all primitive abundant numbers (briefly, PANs) with a fixed $Ω$ (the number of prime factors counted with their multiplicity), and explicitly find all PANs up to $Ω=6$, count all PANs and square-free PANs up to $Ω=7$ and count all odd PANs and odd square-free PANs up to $Ω=8$. We find primitive weird numbers (briefly, PWNs) with up to 16 prime factors, improving the previous results of [Amato-Hasler-Melfi-Parton] where PWNs with up to 6 prime factors have been given. The largest PWN we find has 14712 digits: as far as we know, this is the largest example existing, the previous one being 5328 digits long [Melfi]. We find hundreds of PWNs with exactly one square odd prime factor: as far as we know, only five were known before. We find all PWNs with at least one odd prime factor with multiplicity greater than one and $Ω= 7$ and prove that there are none with $Ω< 7$. Regarding PWNs with a cubic (or higher) odd prime factor, we prove that there are none with $Ω\le 7$, and we did not find any with larger $Ω$. Finally, we find several PWNs with 2 square odd prime factors, and one with 3 square odd prime factors. These are the first such examples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gianluca Amato, Maximilian F. Hasler, Giuseppe Melfi, Maurizio Parton. 2018-02-27. Primitive abundant and weird numbers with many prime factors. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2019.02.027

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Transcendence Meets Normality: Construction of Transcendentally Normal Numbers

In this work, we study real numbers $x$ for which $p(x)$ is (absolutely) normal for every non-constant integer-valued polynomial $p$. We call such numbers transcendentally normal. We prove that almost every real number is transcendentally normal and provide an explicit construction of such a number, based on Sierpinski's covering method and novel ideas involving the so-called stretch function. In the next step, we transform this construction into an algorithm that computes the digits of a t-normal number recursively in all integer bases. Moreover, we extend our covering approach to construct and compute LIL-normal numbers whose discrepancies are of the order predicted by the law of the iterated logarithm. We also take the opportunity to discuss several interesting open problems.

math.NT